FIQDX vs. DGTSX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FIQDX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z) and DGTSX (DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FIQDX returned 6.20%/yr vs 5.39%/yr for DGTSX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIQDX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for DGTSX.

Performance

FIQDX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQDX achieves a 6.68% return, which is significantly higher than DGTSX's 4.30% return.

FIQDX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 6.68%
• 6M: 6.80%
• 1Y: 12.67%
• 3Y*: 8.90%
• 5Y*: 6.20%
• 10Y*: —

DGTSX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 4.30%
• 6M: 4.30%
• 1Y: 9.92%
• 3Y*: 8.27%
• 5Y*: 5.39%
• 10Y*: 5.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQDX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIQDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z	6.68%	10.40%	6.03%	4.55%	-3.17%	15.96%	3.79%	10.63%	-4.90%
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	4.30%	8.39%	7.43%	8.93%	-8.06%	10.20%	7.29%	9.80%	-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQDX and DGTSX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2018	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between FIQDX and DGTSX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FIQDX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQDX

FIQDX Risk / Return Rank: 88
FIQDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FIQDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FIQDX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FIQDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FIQDX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

DGTSX

DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 89
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQDX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIQDX	DGTSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	2.79	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	4.16	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.57	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.67	3.79	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.25	16.65	+2.60

FIQDX vs. DGTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the DGTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQDX and DGTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIQDX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQDX drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQDX and DGTSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIQDX	DGTSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.98%	-16.71%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.69%	-2.64%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.91%	-7.46%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.79%	-11.26%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-11.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.69%	-0.14%	-2.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.97%	-1.64%	-1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	0.60%	+0.06%

Volatility

FIQDX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z (FIQDX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) have volatilities of 1.40% and 1.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIQDX	DGTSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.40%	1.42%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.73%	2.98%	+0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.81%	3.59%	+1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.91%	5.98%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.40%	5.24%	+2.16%

FIQDX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIQDX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison

FIQDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than DGTSX's 5.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	5.70%	5.54%	7.28%	4.75%	2.77%	7.62%	2.12%	2.57%	2.99%	1.25%	1.26%	1.50%
FIQDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class Z	4.27%	4.75%	4.88%	5.38%	7.39%	5.44%	2.29%	3.17%	8.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIQDX and DGTSX in my portfolio?

FIQDX and DGTSX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIQDX or DGTSX?

DGTSX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to FIQDX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQDX dropped -19.98% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.