FIQCX vs. NASDX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FIQCX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z) and NASDX (Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares) are both mutual funds - FIQCX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock, while NASDX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, FIQCX returned 9.10%/yr vs 16.05%/yr for NASDX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FIQCX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for NASDX.

Performance

FIQCX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQCX achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly higher than NASDX's 11.51% return.

FIQCX

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: -0.74%
• 6M: 8.42%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 1Y: 24.46%
• 3Y*: 16.52%
• 5Y*: 9.10%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.72%

NASDX

• 1D: 3.35%
• 1M: -4.19%
• 6M: 10.25%
• YTD: 11.51%
• 1Y: 24.16%
• 3Y*: 25.50%
• 5Y*: 16.05%
• 10Y*: 20.92%
• ALL TIME*: 8.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FIQCX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z	12.29%	20.94%	12.67%	19.15%	-18.53%	17.26%	19.45%	26.32%	-9.86%
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares	11.51%	21.00%	36.91%	54.69%	-32.57%	27.32%	48.59%	38.22%	-12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQCX and NASDX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.88

The correlation between FIQCX and NASDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIQCX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIQCX

FIQCX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FIQCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FIQCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FIQCX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FIQCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FIQCX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

NASDX

NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 39
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIQCX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIQCX	NASDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	1.09	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	1.57	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.19	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	1.78	+0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.22	5.80	+4.42

FIQCX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQCX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIQCX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQCX drawdown since its inception was -30.97%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQCX and NASDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIQCX	NASDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.97%	-83.16%	+52.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.34%	-11.90%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.35%	-22.71%	+7.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.94%	-35.33%	+9.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-8.13%	+6.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.40%	-34.19%	+28.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	3.64%	-1.43%

Volatility

FIQCX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) is 3.93%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that FIQCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIQCX	NASDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	6.86%	-2.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.54%	15.95%	-4.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.67%	19.34%	-5.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.85%	23.54%	-8.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.67%	22.87%	-6.20%

FIQCX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQCX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIQCX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

FIQCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than NASDX's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z	5.11%	5.74%	3.61%	1.43%	5.21%	3.30%	2.07%	5.66%	5.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NASDX Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares	3.23%	3.76%	16.95%	7.61%	3.75%	2.59%	1.28%	7.09%	2.47%	1.65%	0.75%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIQCX and NASDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FIQCX and NASDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FIQCX or NASDX?

NASDX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to FIQCX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQCX dropped -30.97% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIQCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.