PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQCX vs. FSIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQCX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQCX achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than FSIRX's 6.58% return.


FIQCX

1D
1.42%
1M
2.51%
YTD
14.29%
6M
14.38%
1Y
30.93%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*

FSIRX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
6.58%
6M
6.70%
1Y
12.42%
3Y*
8.81%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
5.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQCX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z
14.29%20.94%12.67%19.15%-18.53%17.26%19.45%26.32%-9.86%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
6.58%10.38%5.83%4.58%-3.34%15.89%3.72%10.55%-4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQCX and FSIRX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between FIQCX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQCX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQCX
FIQCX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FIQCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIRX
FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQCX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIQCXFSIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.48

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

4.62

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.24

19.04

-4.80

FIQCX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQCX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIQCX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQCX drawdown since its inception was -30.97%, smaller than the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQCX and FSIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQCXFSIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.97%

-33.39%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

-2.70%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-5.81%

-9.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.94%

-12.82%

-13.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.70%

+2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-4.16%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

0.65%

+1.50%

Volatility

FIQCX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) at 1.36%. This indicates that FIQCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQCXFSIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

1.36%

+4.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

3.88%

+7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

4.91%

+8.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

6.92%

+7.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

6.75%

+9.96%

FIQCX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQCX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQCX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

FIQCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than FSIRX's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z
5.02%5.74%3.61%1.43%5.21%3.30%2.07%5.66%5.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
4.27%4.72%4.80%5.28%7.33%5.37%2.23%3.09%9.42%2.63%2.37%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIQCX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQCX has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to FSIRX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQCX dropped -30.97% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQCX and FSIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer