PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQCX vs. AYBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIQCX having a 14.29% return and AYBLX slightly lower at 14.22%.


FIQCX

1D
1.42%
1M
2.51%
YTD
14.29%
6M
14.38%
1Y
30.93%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*

AYBLX

1D
0.93%
1M
1.85%
YTD
14.22%
6M
14.00%
1Y
33.22%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z
14.29%20.94%12.67%19.15%-18.53%17.26%19.45%26.32%-9.86%
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
14.22%19.80%9.64%15.41%-14.39%15.48%12.92%22.22%-5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQCX and AYBLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.94

The correlation between FIQCX and AYBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQCX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQCX
FIQCX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FIQCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

AYBLX
AYBLX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AYBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AYBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIQCXAYBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.61

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

5.12

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.24

23.78

-9.54

FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the AYBLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQCX and AYBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQCX drawdown since its inception was -30.97%, smaller than the maximum AYBLX drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQCX and AYBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQCXAYBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.97%

-36.28%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

-6.41%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-13.39%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.94%

-20.26%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.32%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-3.78%

-1.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.38%

+0.77%

Volatility

FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) at 3.74%. This indicates that FIQCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQCXAYBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

3.74%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

7.86%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

9.94%

+3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

11.13%

+3.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

11.33%

+5.38%

FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQCX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison

FIQCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than AYBLX's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
3.24%3.58%2.59%1.76%3.23%8.61%4.12%6.03%9.97%9.42%2.63%4.14%
FIQCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z
5.02%5.74%3.61%1.43%5.21%3.30%2.07%5.66%5.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FIQCX and AYBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIQCX has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to AYBLX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQCX dropped -30.97% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.

AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQCX and AYBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer