FIQCX vs. AYBLX
FIQCX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z) and AYBLX (Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FIQCX returned 10.18%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for AYBLX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIQCX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AYBLX.
Performance
FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIQCX having a 14.29% return and AYBLX slightly lower at 14.22%.
FIQCX
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 30.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.18%
- 10Y*
- —
AYBLX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 14.22%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 33.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z | 14.29% | 20.94% | 12.67% | 19.15% | -18.53% | 17.26% | 19.45% | 26.32% | -9.86% |
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 14.22% | 19.80% | 9.64% | 15.41% | -14.39% | 15.48% | 12.92% | 22.22% | -5.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIQCX and AYBLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FIQCX and AYBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIQCX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank
FIQCX
AYBLX
FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIQCX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.61 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 5.12 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.24 | 23.78 | -9.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIQCX drawdown since its inception was -30.97%, smaller than the maximum AYBLX drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQCX and AYBLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIQCX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.97% | -36.28% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.34% | -6.41% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.35% | -13.39% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.94% | -20.26% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -3.78% | -1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 1.38% | +0.77% |
Volatility
FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) at 3.74%. This indicates that FIQCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIQCX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 3.74% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | 7.86% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.09% | 9.94% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 11.13% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 11.33% | +5.38% |
FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIQCX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIQCX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison
FIQCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than AYBLX's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 3.24% | 3.58% | 2.59% | 1.76% | 3.23% | 8.61% | 4.12% | 6.03% | 9.97% | 9.42% | 2.63% | 4.14% |
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z | 5.02% | 5.74% | 3.61% | 1.43% | 5.21% | 3.30% | 2.07% | 5.66% | 5.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FIQCX and AYBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIQCX has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to AYBLX (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQCX dropped -30.97% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.
AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIQCX and AYBLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer