PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQBX vs. AYBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQBX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class Z (FIQBX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQBX achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 12.02% return.


FIQBX

1D
1.69%
1M
-0.72%
6M
7.02%
YTD
10.30%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
14.35%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.16%

AYBLX

1D
0.92%
1M
-1.73%
6M
9.12%
YTD
12.02%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
9.99%
ALL TIME*
7.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIQBX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class Z
10.30%18.32%10.83%16.52%-16.71%14.05%17.29%22.89%-7.99%
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
12.02%19.80%9.64%15.41%-14.39%15.48%12.92%22.22%-5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQBX and AYBLX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.94

The correlation between FIQBX and AYBLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQBX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIQBX
FIQBX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FIQBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AYBLX
AYBLX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
AYBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AYBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AYBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AYBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AYBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIQBX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class Z (FIQBX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIQBXAYBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

3.93

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

16.91

-6.77

FIQBX vs. AYBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the AYBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQBX and AYBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIQBX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQBX drawdown since its inception was -27.18%, smaller than the maximum AYBLX drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQBX and AYBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQBXAYBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.18%

-36.28%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.97%

-6.41%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.76%

-13.39%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.52%

-20.26%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-2.40%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-3.77%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.49%

+0.40%

Volatility

FIQBX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class Z (FIQBX) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) at 2.35%. This indicates that FIQBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQBXAYBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

2.35%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

7.97%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

10.14%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.46%

11.15%

+1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

11.33%

+2.51%

FIQBX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQBX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQBX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison

FIQBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.77%, more than AYBLX's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AYBLX
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund
3.30%3.58%2.59%1.76%3.23%8.61%4.12%6.03%9.97%9.42%2.63%4.14%
FIQBX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class Z
6.77%7.47%4.72%1.81%6.78%2.86%2.26%5.29%6.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FIQBX and AYBLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIQBX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to AYBLX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQBX dropped -27.18% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.

AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQBX and AYBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer