PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQAX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQAX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z (FIQAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQAX achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 17.65% return.


FIQAX

1D
0.43%
1M
3.87%
YTD
10.39%
6M
11.21%
1Y
23.55%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*

MHELX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.75%
YTD
17.65%
6M
20.19%
1Y
39.35%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQAX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z
10.39%16.70%9.53%14.82%-16.13%12.00%16.13%20.73%-10.66%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
17.65%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-13.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQAX and MHELX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between FIQAX and MHELX has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQAX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQAX
FIQAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FIQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQAX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z (FIQAX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIQAXMHELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.39

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

4.64

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.85

15.69

-0.85

FIQAX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQAX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIQAXMHELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.06

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.24

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.33

+0.41

Drawdowns

FIQAX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQAX drawdown since its inception was -24.37%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQAX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQAXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.37%

-61.24%

+36.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-8.52%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.95%

-30.81%

+19.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.36%

-32.01%

+9.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-12.93%

+8.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.51%

-0.90%

Volatility

FIQAX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z (FIQAX) is 3.01%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that FIQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQAXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

4.53%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.49%

15.24%

-7.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.14%

19.23%

-10.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

21.00%

-10.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.11%

20.97%

-8.86%

FIQAX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQAX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQAX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

FIQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, less than MHELX's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z
5.41%5.97%3.39%2.01%4.53%2.65%1.94%4.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.13%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIQAX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to FIQAX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQAX dropped -24.37% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

FIQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQAX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer