PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQAX vs. BWBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQAX vs. BWBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z (FIQAX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQAX achieves a 10.39% return, which is significantly higher than BWBIX's 0.74% return.


FIQAX

1D
0.43%
1M
3.87%
YTD
10.39%
6M
11.21%
1Y
23.55%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
7.42%
10Y*

BWBIX

1D
-1.04%
1M
4.14%
YTD
0.74%
6M
5.76%
1Y
11.63%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQAX vs. BWBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z
10.39%16.70%9.53%14.82%-16.13%12.00%16.13%20.73%-10.66%
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
0.74%10.23%19.62%25.77%-32.58%14.76%62.85%36.41%-10.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQAX and BWBIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.88

The correlation between FIQAX and BWBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQAX vs. BWBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQAX
FIQAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FIQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BWBIX
BWBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BWBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BWBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQAX vs. BWBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z (FIQAX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIQAXBWBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.16

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

1.05

+2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.85

3.47

+11.38

FIQAX vs. BWBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the BWBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQAX and BWBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIQAXBWBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

0.85

+1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.22

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.53

+0.20

Drawdowns

FIQAX vs. BWBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQAX drawdown since its inception was -24.37%, smaller than the maximum BWBIX drawdown of -39.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQAX and BWBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQAXBWBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.37%

-39.14%

+14.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-11.65%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.95%

-21.59%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.36%

-39.14%

+16.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.26%

+1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-11.72%

+7.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

3.53%

-1.92%

Volatility

FIQAX vs. BWBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z (FIQAX) is 3.01%, while Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that FIQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQAXBWBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

3.38%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.49%

10.99%

-3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.14%

14.36%

-5.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

21.08%

-10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.11%

23.14%

-11.03%

FIQAX vs. BWBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQAX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than BWBIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQAX vs. BWBIX - Dividend Comparison

FIQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, less than BWBIX's 7.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BWBIX
Baron WealthBuilder Fund
7.55%7.61%0.77%0.06%3.21%3.75%1.24%3.51%0.14%
FIQAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class Z
5.41%5.97%3.39%2.01%4.53%2.65%1.94%4.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIQAX and BWBIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWBIX has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to FIQAX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQAX dropped -24.37% vs BWBIX's -39.14%.

FIQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQAX and BWBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer