FIPFX vs. ITDF
FIPFX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class) and ITDF (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FIPFX returned 22.75% vs 21.78% for ITDF. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FIPFX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for ITDF.
Performance
FIPFX vs. ITDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIPFX achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than ITDF's 10.71% return.
FIPFX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
ITDF
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 21.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIPFX vs. ITDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FIPFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class | 11.64% | 21.40% | 14.15% | 11.84% |
ITDF Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF | 10.71% | 20.86% | 16.15% | 12.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIPFX and ITDF is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | 0.99 |
The correlation between FIPFX and ITDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIPFX vs. ITDF — Risk / Return Rank
FIPFX
ITDF
FIPFX vs. ITDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIPFX | ITDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.31 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.35 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.52 | 10.08 | +0.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIPFX vs. ITDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIPFX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, which is greater than ITDF's maximum drawdown of -15.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIPFX and ITDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIPFX | ITDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.71% | -15.67% | -15.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -9.32% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -1.47% | +0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -1.51% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 2.16% | -0.05% |
Volatility
FIPFX vs. ITDF - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) at 4.07%. This indicates that FIPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIPFX | ITDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 4.07% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 10.67% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.50% | 12.76% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.55% | 13.95% | +0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 13.95% | +1.19% |
FIPFX vs. ITDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIPFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than ITDF's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FIPFX vs. ITDF - Dividend Comparison
FIPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than ITDF's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIPFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class | 1.76% | 1.97% | 2.00% | 1.94% | 2.02% | 1.93% | 1.95% | 15.16% | 2.28% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 2.00% |
ITDF Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF | 1.49% | 1.65% | 1.55% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, FIPFX and ITDF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIPFX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to ITDF (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIPFX dropped -30.71% vs ITDF's -15.67%.
FIPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIPFX and ITDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer