PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIPFX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIPFX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIPFX achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 10.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FIPFX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 11.61%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.60% annualized return.


FIPFX

1D
0.32%
1M
1.02%
6M
8.69%
YTD
11.64%
1Y
22.75%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
11.61%

FCNTX

1D
0.34%
1M
2.56%
6M
8.88%
YTD
10.81%
1Y
20.89%
3Y*
26.73%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
17.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIPFX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIPFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class
11.64%21.40%14.15%19.91%-18.22%15.93%16.46%26.02%-7.28%20.54%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
10.81%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FIPFX and FCNTX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2009

0.90

The correlation between FIPFX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIPFX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIPFX
FIPFX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FIPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FIPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIPFX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIPFXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.82

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

7.47

+3.05

FIPFX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIPFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIPFX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIPFX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIPFX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIPFX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIPFXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.71%

-49.19%

+18.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-11.30%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.71%

-19.75%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.20%

-32.59%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.71%

-32.59%

+1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-0.63%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-8.14%

+3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.75%

-0.64%

Volatility

FIPFX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) is 4.59%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that FIPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIPFXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

6.16%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

12.10%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

15.13%

-2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

19.35%

-4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

19.71%

-4.57%

FIPFX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIPFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIPFX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FIPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than FCNTX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.21%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FIPFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class
1.76%1.97%2.00%1.94%2.02%1.93%1.95%15.16%2.28%2.05%2.09%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIPFX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to FIPFX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIPFX dropped -30.71% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FIPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIPFX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer