PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIOOX vs. FGIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIOOX vs. FGIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Large Cap Value Index Fund (FIOOX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIOOX achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly lower than FGIPX's 18.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FIOOX has underperformed FGIPX with an annualized return of 11.18%, while FGIPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


FIOOX

1D
0.77%
1M
4.25%
YTD
14.32%
6M
14.94%
1Y
28.42%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
11.18%

FGIPX

1D
0.92%
1M
7.15%
YTD
18.05%
6M
22.61%
1Y
44.81%
3Y*
26.79%
5Y*
16.57%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIOOX vs. FGIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIOOX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Value Index Fund
14.32%15.95%14.34%11.60%-7.56%25.23%2.85%26.57%-8.28%11.06%
FGIPX
Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class
18.05%30.18%15.44%12.17%3.28%21.73%-4.59%25.96%-9.95%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FIOOX and FGIPX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013

0.94

The correlation between FIOOX and FGIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIOOX vs. FGIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIOOX
FIOOX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FIOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FIOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FGIPX
FGIPX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FGIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FGIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIOOX vs. FGIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Large Cap Value Index Fund (FIOOX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIOOXFGIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.73

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

6.33

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.02

24.22

-6.20

FIOOX vs. FGIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIOOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is lower than the FGIPX Sharpe Ratio of 4.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIOOX and FGIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIOOXFGIPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

4.03

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.12

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.77

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.74

-0.14

Drawdowns

FIOOX vs. FGIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIOOX drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FGIPX drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIOOX and FGIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIOOXFGIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.31%

-37.32%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-7.26%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.66%

-13.27%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.02%

-16.19%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.31%

-37.32%

-0.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-4.18%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.89%

-0.27%

Volatility

FIOOX vs. FGIPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Large Cap Value Index Fund (FIOOX) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) at 2.79%. This indicates that FIOOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIOOXFGIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

2.79%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

8.23%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.82%

11.40%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

14.89%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

17.12%

+0.26%

FIOOX vs. FGIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIOOX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIPX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIOOX vs. FGIPX - Dividend Comparison

FIOOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than FGIPX's 10.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGIPX
Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class
10.00%11.68%12.69%7.50%7.35%12.20%2.13%52.72%25.63%5.58%4.22%5.88%
FIOOX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Value Index Fund
3.09%3.66%3.30%4.31%4.39%6.12%2.59%6.82%4.99%1.74%2.48%6.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIOOX and FGIPX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIOOX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to FGIPX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIOOX dropped -38.31% vs FGIPX's -37.32%.

FGIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIOOX and FGIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer