PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FINW.L vs. X7PP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FINW.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FINW.L is traded in USD, while X7PP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the X7PP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FINW.L achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than X7PP.L's 4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FINW.L has underperformed X7PP.L with an annualized return of 12.08%, while X7PP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.08% annualized return.


FINW.L

1D
1.90%
1M
1.63%
YTD
0.26%
6M
4.48%
1Y
13.90%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
12.08%

X7PP.L

1D
0.49%
1M
5.45%
YTD
4.95%
6M
12.43%
1Y
41.85%
3Y*
46.54%
5Y*
26.10%
10Y*
14.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FINW.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FINW.L
Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS
0.26%29.01%26.29%16.30%-9.87%28.61%-2.86%25.04%-17.55%23.46%
X7PP.L
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF
4.95%101.94%24.95%29.78%-5.30%27.99%-16.01%12.68%-29.67%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FINW.L and X7PP.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014

0.79

The correlation between FINW.L and X7PP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FINW.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FINW.L
X7PP.L

Technology

40.1%

-

Financial Services

14.4%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

10.1%

-

Communication Services

7.8%

-

Industrials

5.2%

-

Healthcare

3.9%

-

Basic Materials

3.6%

-

Energy

2.6%

-

Utilities

0.7%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Technology

FINW.L
40.1%
X7PP.L

-

Financial Services

FINW.L
14.4%
X7PP.L
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FINW.L
11.1%
X7PP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

FINW.L
10.1%
X7PP.L

-

Communication Services

FINW.L
7.8%
X7PP.L

-

Industrials

FINW.L
5.2%
X7PP.L

-

Healthcare

FINW.L
3.9%
X7PP.L

-

Basic Materials

FINW.L
3.6%
X7PP.L

-

Energy

FINW.L
2.6%
X7PP.L

-

Utilities

FINW.L
0.7%
X7PP.L

-

Real Estate

FINW.L
0.5%
X7PP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FINW.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FINW.L
FINW.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FINW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FINW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

X7PP.L
X7PP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINW.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FINW.LX7PP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.30

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

2.30

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

7.31

-3.10

FINW.L vs. X7PP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FINW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FINW.L and X7PP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FINW.LX7PP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.76

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.99

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.51

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.30

+0.20

Drawdowns

FINW.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINW.L drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -62.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINW.L and X7PP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FINW.LX7PP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.64%

-62.74%

+19.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

-18.12%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-19.96%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

-38.99%

+11.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.64%

-62.02%

+18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-3.60%

+2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-22.28%

+14.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

5.71%

-2.42%

Volatility

FINW.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) is 4.16%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that FINW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FINW.LX7PP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

6.89%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

19.40%

-8.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

23.72%

-9.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

26.33%

-8.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.24%

27.41%

-8.17%

FINW.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FINW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FINW.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FINW.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FINW.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, X7PP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

X7PP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FINW.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FINW.L and 0.20% for X7PP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FINW.L and X7PP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer