FINW.L vs. IUFS.L
FINW.L (Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS) and IUFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Financials Equities funds - FINW.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD while IUFS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FINW.L returned 12.08%/yr vs 12.21%/yr for IUFS.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FINW.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUFS.L.
Performance
FINW.L vs. IUFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FINW.L achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than IUFS.L's -5.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FINW.L having a 12.08% annualized return and IUFS.L not far ahead at 12.21%.
FINW.L
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- 13.90%
- 3Y*
- 23.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
IUFS.L
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- -5.06%
- 6M
- -2.04%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 18.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
FINW.L vs. IUFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FINW.L Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS | 0.26% | 29.01% | 26.29% | 16.30% | -9.87% | 28.61% | -2.86% | 25.04% | -17.55% | 23.46% |
IUFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | -5.06% | 15.05% | 30.22% | 12.12% | -11.04% | 36.28% | -3.33% | 31.22% | -14.36% | 23.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FINW.L and IUFS.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FINW.L and IUFS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
FINW.L vs. IUFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FINW.L
IUFS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FINW.L
IUFS.L
Financial Services
FINW.L
IUFS.L
Consumer Cyclical
FINW.L
IUFS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
FINW.L
IUFS.L
-
Communication Services
FINW.L
IUFS.L
-
Industrials
FINW.L
IUFS.L
Healthcare
FINW.L
IUFS.L
-
Basic Materials
FINW.L
IUFS.L
-
Energy
FINW.L
IUFS.L
-
Utilities
FINW.L
IUFS.L
-
Real Estate
FINW.L
IUFS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FINW.L vs. IUFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FINW.L
IUFS.L
FINW.L vs. IUFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FINW.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.05 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 0.25 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 0.64 | +3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FINW.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.24 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.42 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.58 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.53 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
FINW.L vs. IUFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FINW.L drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, roughly equal to the maximum IUFS.L drawdown of -42.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINW.L and IUFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FINW.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.64% | -42.92% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -13.95% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -16.62% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.31% | -26.02% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.64% | -42.92% | -0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -6.87% | +5.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -7.86% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 5.54% | -2.25% |
Volatility
FINW.L vs. IUFS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) is 4.16%, while iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that FINW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FINW.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 4.43% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 11.26% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 14.73% | -0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 18.98% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 21.09% | -1.85% |
FINW.L vs. IUFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FINW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IUFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FINW.L vs. IUFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FINW.L nor IUFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FINW.L and IUFS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IUFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FINW.L.
FINW.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while IUFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FINW.L and 0.15% for IUFS.L.
Find the right allocation for FINW.L and IUFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer