FINW.L vs. FNCW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FINW.L (Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS) and FNCW.L (SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from Amundi and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FINW.L returned 23.94%/yr vs 24.05%/yr for FNCW.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.

Performance

FINW.L vs. FNCW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FINW.L is traded in USD, while FNCW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FNCW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FINW.L achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than FNCW.L's 0.18% return.

FINW.L

• 1D: 1.90%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: 4.48%
• 1Y: 13.90%
• 3Y*: 23.94%
• 5Y*: 11.72%
• 10Y*: 12.08%

FNCW.L

• 1D: 1.96%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 4.44%
• 1Y: 14.42%
• 3Y*: 24.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FINW.L vs. FNCW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FINW.L Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS	0.26%	29.01%	26.29%	16.30%	-8.21%
FNCW.L SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF	0.18%	29.48%	26.62%	15.72%	-7.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FINW.L and FNCW.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022	0.93

The correlation between FINW.L and FNCW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FINW.L vs. FNCW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FINW.L	FNCW.L
Technology	40.1%	1.3%
Financial Services	14.4%	98.2%
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	10.1%	-
Communication Services	7.8%	-
Industrials	5.2%	0.2%
Healthcare	3.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	3.6%	-
Energy	2.6%	0.1%
Utilities	0.7%	0.1%
Real Estate	0.5%	0.1%

Return for Risk

FINW.L vs. FNCW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FINW.L

FINW.L Risk / Return Rank: 27
FINW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FINW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FINW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FINW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FINW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

FNCW.L

FNCW.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
FNCW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FNCW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FNCW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FNCW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FNCW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINW.L vs. FNCW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FINW.L	FNCW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	1.06	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	1.61	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.18	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	1.26	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.21	4.21	0.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FINW.L vs. FNCW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FINW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the FNCW.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FINW.L and FNCW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FINW.L	FNCW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	1.06	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.85	-0.35

Drawdowns

FINW.L vs. FNCW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINW.L drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, which is greater than FNCW.L's maximum drawdown of -21.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINW.L and FNCW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FINW.L	FNCW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.64%	-21.99%	-21.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.98%	-11.42%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.81%	-15.90%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-1.92%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.59%	-4.46%	-3.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	3.41%	-0.12%

Volatility

FINW.L vs. FNCW.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L) at 3.87%. This indicates that FINW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FINW.L	FNCW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	3.87%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.30%	10.67%	+0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.26%	13.61%	+0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.85%	16.96%	+0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.24%	16.96%	+2.28%

FINW.L vs. FNCW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FINW.L and FNCW.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

Dividends

FINW.L vs. FNCW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FINW.L nor FNCW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FINW.L and FNCW.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FINW.L and FNCW.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, FINW.L or FNCW.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FINW.L or FNCW.L?

FINW.L and FNCW.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

What is the main difference between FINW.L and FNCW.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street.