PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FINW.L vs. 500U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FINW.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FINW.L achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than 500U.L's 10.41% return. Over the past 10 years, FINW.L has underperformed 500U.L with an annualized return of 12.08%, while 500U.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.69% annualized return.


FINW.L

1D
1.90%
1M
1.63%
YTD
0.26%
6M
4.48%
1Y
13.90%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
12.08%

500U.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.52%
YTD
10.41%
6M
11.24%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FINW.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FINW.L
Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS
0.26%29.01%26.29%16.30%-9.87%28.61%-2.86%25.04%-17.55%23.46%
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.41%17.98%24.83%26.85%-19.06%30.19%18.05%32.02%-5.58%21.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FINW.L and 500U.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2011

0.55

The correlation between FINW.L and 500U.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FINW.L vs. 500U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FINW.L
500U.L

Technology

40.1%
35.6%

Financial Services

14.4%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
4.9%

Communication Services

7.8%
11.2%

Industrials

5.2%
8.3%

Healthcare

3.9%
8.5%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.8%

Energy

2.6%
3.5%

Utilities

0.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.9%

Technology

FINW.L
40.1%
500U.L
35.6%

Financial Services

FINW.L
14.4%
500U.L
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FINW.L
11.1%
500U.L
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

FINW.L
10.1%
500U.L
4.9%

Communication Services

FINW.L
7.8%
500U.L
11.2%

Industrials

FINW.L
5.2%
500U.L
8.3%

Healthcare

FINW.L
3.9%
500U.L
8.5%

Basic Materials

FINW.L
3.6%
500U.L
1.8%

Energy

FINW.L
2.6%
500U.L
3.5%

Utilities

FINW.L
0.7%
500U.L
2.4%

Real Estate

FINW.L
0.5%
500U.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FINW.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FINW.L
FINW.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FINW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FINW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

500U.L
500U.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
500U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
500U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
500U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
500U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
500U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINW.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FINW.L500U.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.44

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

3.34

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

14.61

-10.40

FINW.L vs. 500U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FINW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the 500U.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FINW.L and 500U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FINW.L500U.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

2.41

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.88

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

1.12

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.23

-0.72

Drawdowns

FINW.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINW.L drawdown since its inception was -43.64%, which is greater than 500U.L's maximum drawdown of -34.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINW.L and 500U.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FINW.L500U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.64%

-34.04%

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

-8.34%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-18.29%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

-24.22%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.64%

-34.04%

-9.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-0.51%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-4.73%

-2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

1.91%

+1.38%

Volatility

FINW.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI World Financials TR UCITS (FINW.L) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) at 3.21%. This indicates that FINW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FINW.L500U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.21%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

8.54%

+2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

11.57%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

15.79%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.24%

18.26%

+0.98%

FINW.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FINW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FINW.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FINW.L nor 500U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FINW.L and 500U.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 500U.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

500U.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FINW.L.

FINW.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while 500U.L is S&P 500. FINW.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FINW.L and 0.15% for 500U.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FINW.L and 500U.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer