FINFX vs. WMFFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FINFX (American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-2) and WMFFX (Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2) are both mutual funds - FINFX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by American Funds, while WMFFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the past 10 years, FINFX returned 15.13%/yr vs 13.00%/yr for WMFFX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FINFX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for WMFFX.

Performance

FINFX vs. WMFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-2 (FINFX) and Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FINFX achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly higher than WMFFX's 5.96% return. Over the past 10 years, FINFX has outperformed WMFFX with an annualized return of 15.13%, while WMFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.00% annualized return.

FINFX

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 5.92%
• YTD: 15.23%
• 6M: 16.26%
• 1Y: 34.80%
• 3Y*: 26.35%
• 5Y*: 15.15%
• 10Y*: 15.13%

WMFFX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 5.96%
• 6M: 6.10%
• 1Y: 17.77%
• 3Y*: 18.31%
• 5Y*: 12.04%
• 10Y*: 13.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FINFX vs. WMFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FINFX American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-2	15.23%	24.44%	22.98%	26.14%	-16.47%	22.68%	15.16%	27.34%	-7.96%	23.00%
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2	5.96%	17.42%	19.24%	16.96%	-8.27%	28.71%	7.89%	25.03%	-5.98%	20.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FINFX and WMFFX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008	0.95

The correlation between FINFX and WMFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FINFX vs. WMFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FINFX

FINFX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FINFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FINFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FINFX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FINFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FINFX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

WMFFX

WMFFX Risk / Return Rank: 39
WMFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
WMFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
WMFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
WMFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
WMFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINFX vs. WMFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-2 (FINFX) and Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FINFX	WMFFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	1.80	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	2.56	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.33	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	2.21	+1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.58	9.58	+6.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FINFX vs. WMFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FINFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the WMFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FINFX and WMFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FINFX	WMFFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	1.80	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.86	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.80	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.60	+0.01

Drawdowns

FINFX vs. WMFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINFX drawdown since its inception was -46.54%, roughly equal to the maximum WMFFX drawdown of -47.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINFX and WMFFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FINFX	WMFFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.54%	-47.21%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.64%	-8.36%	-2.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.94%	-14.64%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.95%	-18.53%	-6.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.91%	-34.63%	+0.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.99%	-5.36%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	1.93%	+0.36%

Volatility

FINFX vs. WMFFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-2 (FINFX) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2 (WMFFX) at 2.42%. This indicates that FINFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FINFX	WMFFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.69%	2.42%	+1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.83%	7.89%	+2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.76%	10.32%	+3.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.80%	14.11%	+2.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.73%	16.33%	+1.40%

FINFX vs. WMFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FINFX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than WMFFX's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

FINFX vs. WMFFX - Dividend Comparison

FINFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.59%, less than WMFFX's 9.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FINFX American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class F-2	7.59%	8.73%	9.11%	6.01%	5.21%	11.19%	2.81%	7.11%	9.54%	7.46%	4.91%	6.29%
WMFFX Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class F-2	9.74%	10.28%	10.27%	5.92%	6.53%	6.24%	3.26%	6.33%	4.59%	7.43%	6.56%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FINFX and WMFFX in my portfolio?

FINFX and WMFFX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FINFX or WMFFX?

FINFX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to WMFFX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FINFX dropped -46.54% vs WMFFX's -47.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FINFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.