FIND.L vs. META.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FIND.L (WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated) and META.L (WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced) are both Metals funds from WisdomTree - FIND.L tracks the Bloomberg Industrial Metals 3 Month Forward while META.L tracks the Optimised Roll Industrial Metals. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FIND.L returned 13.69%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for META.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FIND.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for META.L.

Performance

FIND.L vs. META.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated (FIND.L) and WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIND.L achieves a 15.30% return, which is significantly higher than META.L's 10.73% return.

FIND.L

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 4.52%
• YTD: 15.30%
• 6M: 20.95%
• 1Y: 32.15%
• 3Y*: 13.69%
• 5Y*: 6.19%
• 10Y*: 8.51%

META.L

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 3.62%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 6M: 17.26%
• 1Y: 30.93%
• 3Y*: 11.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIND.L vs. META.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FIND.L WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated	15.30%	19.87%	3.63%	-11.12%	16.83%
META.L WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced	10.73%	16.98%	3.79%	-8.15%	16.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FIND.L and META.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.96

The correlation between FIND.L and META.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIND.L vs. META.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIND.L

FIND.L Risk / Return Rank: 47
FIND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FIND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FIND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FIND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FIND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

META.L

META.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
META.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
META.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
META.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
META.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
META.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIND.L vs. META.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated (FIND.L) and WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIND.L	META.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.02	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.78	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.36	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	3.42	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.30	12.10	-5.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIND.L vs. META.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIND.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the META.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIND.L and META.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIND.L	META.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.02	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.56	-0.53

Drawdowns

FIND.L vs. META.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIND.L drawdown since its inception was -65.36%, which is greater than META.L's maximum drawdown of -20.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIND.L and META.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIND.L	META.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.36%	-20.21%	-45.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.60%	-9.01%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	-20.21%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.03%	-1.41%	-11.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.53%	-9.94%	-32.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.09%	2.55%	+2.54%

Volatility

FIND.L vs. META.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Industrial Metals Longer Dated (FIND.L) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L) at 4.42%. This indicates that FIND.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIND.L	META.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.52%	4.42%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.74%	12.91%	+0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.31%	15.22%	+4.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.58%	17.54%	+5.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.71%	17.54%	+2.17%

FIND.L vs. META.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIND.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than META.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIND.L vs. META.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FIND.L nor META.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIND.L and META.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FIND.L and META.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, FIND.L or META.L?

On fees, META.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIND.L or META.L?

META.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FIND.L.

What is the main difference between FIND.L and META.L?

FIND.L tracks Bloomberg Industrial Metals 3 Month Forward, while META.L tracks Optimised Roll Industrial Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FIND.L and 0.40% for META.L.