FIMVX vs. CAAPX
FIMVX (Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund) and CAAPX (Ariel Appreciation Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FIMVX returned 8.64%/yr vs 4.76%/yr for CAAPX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIMVX charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for CAAPX.
Performance
FIMVX vs. CAAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIMVX achieves a 15.21% return, which is significantly higher than CAAPX's 9.88% return.
FIMVX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 27.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- —
CAAPX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.54%
FIMVX vs. CAAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund | 15.21% | 11.01% | 13.02% | 12.75% | -12.08% | 28.21% | 4.74% | 7.42% |
CAAPX Ariel Appreciation Fund | 9.88% | 11.04% | 6.07% | 10.58% | -12.27% | 25.72% | 7.42% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIMVX and CAAPX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FIMVX and CAAPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIMVX vs. CAAPX — Risk / Return Rank
FIMVX
CAAPX
FIMVX vs. CAAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX) and Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIMVX | CAAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.33 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 2.92 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.28 | 8.98 | +5.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIMVX | CAAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.89 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.22 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
FIMVX vs. CAAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIMVX drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, smaller than the maximum CAAPX drawdown of -61.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIMVX and CAAPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIMVX | CAAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.61% | -61.92% | +18.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.52% | -11.70% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.40% | -27.29% | +6.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | -33.40% | +12.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.98% | +0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -8.06% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 3.79% | -1.79% |
Volatility
FIMVX vs. CAAPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX) is 3.45%, while Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that FIMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIMVX | CAAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.45% | 4.13% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.56% | 12.73% | -3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 18.10% | -4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.32% | 22.25% | -4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 22.17% | -0.33% |
FIMVX vs. CAAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIMVX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CAAPX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIMVX vs. CAAPX - Dividend Comparison
FIMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than CAAPX's 11.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAAPX Ariel Appreciation Fund | 11.71% | 12.86% | 6.11% | 6.31% | 10.51% | 14.21% | 9.85% | 7.58% | 7.37% | 12.53% | 7.88% | 12.05% |
FIMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund | 2.15% | 2.48% | 4.44% | 1.89% | 2.75% | 5.62% | 1.23% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIMVX and CAAPX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAAPX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to FIMVX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIMVX dropped -43.61% vs CAAPX's -61.92%.
FIMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIMVX and CAAPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer