PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIMPX vs. JGMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIMPX vs. JGMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FIMPX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIMPX achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly lower than JGMNX's 12.46% return. Over the past 10 years, FIMPX has outperformed JGMNX with an annualized return of 11.41%, while JGMNX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.34% annualized return.


FIMPX

1D
1.24%
1M
2.80%
YTD
10.18%
6M
7.04%
1Y
26.97%
3Y*
18.20%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*
11.41%

JGMNX

1D
0.85%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
12.46%
6M
11.48%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
10.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIMPX vs. JGMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIMPX
Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opportunities Fund
10.18%12.08%17.53%18.92%-27.45%0.22%47.96%29.90%-5.61%17.00%
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
12.46%9.78%10.55%14.83%-23.56%6.88%28.75%28.60%-5.03%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FIMPX and JGMNX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2012

0.94

The correlation between FIMPX and JGMNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIMPX vs. JGMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIMPX
FIMPX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FIMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FIMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

JGMNX
JGMNX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
JGMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
JGMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIMPX vs. JGMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FIMPX) and Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIMPXJGMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.40

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

9.90

-4.00

FIMPX vs. JGMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIMPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the JGMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIMPX and JGMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIMPXJGMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.65

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.23

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.50

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.59

-0.06

Drawdowns

FIMPX vs. JGMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIMPX drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, which is greater than JGMNX's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIMPX and JGMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIMPXJGMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.32%

-39.72%

-18.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.72%

-11.03%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.99%

-23.84%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.29%

-31.74%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.29%

-39.72%

-6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.21%

-7.13%

-7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.64%

2.67%

+1.97%

Volatility

FIMPX vs. JGMNX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FIMPX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N (JGMNX) at 5.14%. This indicates that FIMPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JGMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIMPXJGMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

5.14%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

12.39%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.72%

16.07%

+3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.98%

19.59%

+4.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.86%

20.58%

+3.28%

FIMPX vs. JGMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIMPX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than JGMNX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIMPX vs. JGMNX - Dividend Comparison

FIMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than JGMNX's 9.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIMPX
Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opportunities Fund
4.99%5.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.33%10.34%0.00%15.29%11.52%0.39%9.04%
JGMNX
Janus Henderson Triton Fund Class N
9.66%10.86%7.35%6.96%6.10%19.99%4.06%4.20%7.41%5.03%2.96%7.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FIMPX and JGMNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIMPX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to JGMNX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIMPX dropped -58.32% vs JGMNX's -39.72%.

JGMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIMPX and JGMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer