FIMKX vs. DEMAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I (FIMKX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX).
FIMKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 29, 2004. DEMAX is an actively managed fund by Nomura. It was launched on Jun 10, 1996.
Performance
FIMKX vs. DEMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIMKX vs. DEMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I | 0.92% | 40.06% | 9.31% | 8.44% | -19.82% | -2.63% | 30.43% | 29.75% | -18.06% | 46.67% |
DEMAX Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 13.26% | 86.33% | 6.25% | 17.34% | -28.85% | -2.32% | 25.54% | 24.05% | -17.32% | 41.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIMKX achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than DEMAX's 13.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FIMKX has underperformed DEMAX with an annualized return of 10.38%, while DEMAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.
FIMKX
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -13.14%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 6.57%
- 1Y
- 33.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
DEMAX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -18.27%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 43.25%
- 1Y
- 104.18%
- 3Y*
- 34.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIMKX vs. DEMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIMKX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMAX's 1.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIMKX vs. DEMAX — Risk / Return Rank
FIMKX
DEMAX
FIMKX vs. DEMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I (FIMKX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIMKX | DEMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | 3.10 | -1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.23 | 3.27 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.50 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 4.78 | -2.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.35 | 18.45 | -10.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIMKX | DEMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 3.10 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.53 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.64 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.43 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIMKX and DEMAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIMKX vs. DEMAX - Dividend Comparison
FIMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than DEMAX's 16.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I | 1.56% | 1.57% | 1.20% | 1.60% | 1.14% | 5.19% | 2.09% | 10.86% | 0.61% | 0.10% | 0.45% | 0.19% |
DEMAX Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 16.80% | 19.03% | 1.74% | 2.76% | 1.60% | 3.16% | 0.56% | 0.57% | 0.34% | 1.59% | 0.70% | 0.03% |
Drawdowns
FIMKX vs. DEMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIMKX drawdown since its inception was -69.98%, which is greater than DEMAX's maximum drawdown of -63.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIMKX and DEMAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIMKX | DEMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.98% | -63.23% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.72% | -20.32% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.49% | -44.15% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | -46.51% | +4.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.72% | -19.55% | +5.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -18.84% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 5.27% | -1.73% |
Volatility
FIMKX vs. DEMAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I (FIMKX) is 8.53%, while Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX) has a volatility of 19.13%. This indicates that FIMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIMKX | DEMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.53% | 19.13% | -10.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 28.50% | -15.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.40% | 33.35% | -14.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 23.12% | -4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 21.94% | -3.39% |