FIMIX vs. FDMMX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FIMIX (Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund) and FDMMX (Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FIMIX returned 1.83%/yr vs 1.69%/yr for FDMMX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIMIX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDMMX.

Performance

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund (FIMIX) and Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (FDMMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIMIX achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than FDMMX's 1.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FIMIX has outperformed FDMMX with an annualized return of 1.83%, while FDMMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.69% annualized return.

FIMIX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 1.09%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: 0.94%
• 10Y*: 1.83%

FDMMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.56%
• YTD: 1.57%
• 6M: 1.98%
• 1Y: 6.76%
• 3Y*: 3.97%
• 5Y*: 0.75%
• 10Y*: 1.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIMIX Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund	1.09%	5.80%	1.22%	5.02%	-8.12%	0.40%	4.49%	7.13%	0.65%	4.55%
FDMMX Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund	1.57%	5.24%	1.27%	5.76%	-9.67%	1.11%	4.27%	7.09%	-0.13%	5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FIMIX and FDMMX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001	0.90

The correlation between FIMIX and FDMMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIMIX vs. FDMMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIMIX

FIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

FDMMX

FDMMX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FDMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FDMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FDMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FDMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FDMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund (FIMIX) and Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (FDMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIMIX	FDMMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.67	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	4.06	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.70	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	2.33	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.36	7.90	-1.53

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FDMMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIMIX and FDMMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIMIX drawdown since its inception was -12.52%, smaller than the maximum FDMMX drawdown of -18.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIMIX and FDMMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIMIX	FDMMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.52%	-18.98%	+6.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.33%	-2.91%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.07%	-5.29%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.52%	-13.70%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.52%	-13.70%	+1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-0.50%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-2.36%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	0.86%	+0.16%

Volatility

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund (FIMIX) and Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (FDMMX) have volatilities of 0.70% and 0.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIMIX	FDMMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.70%	0.71%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.08%	2.07%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59%	2.54%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.56%	3.66%	-0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.65%	3.84%	-0.19%

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIMIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FDMMX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Dividend Comparison

FIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than FDMMX's 2.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDMMX Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund	2.71%	3.54%	2.67%	2.43%	1.46%	2.31%	2.23%	2.63%	2.76%	2.99%	4.56%	3.20%
FIMIX Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund	2.68%	3.57%	2.66%	2.29%	1.44%	1.81%	2.12%	2.56%	2.63%	2.53%	3.25%	2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIMIX and FDMMX in my portfolio?

FIMIX and FDMMX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIMIX or FDMMX?

FDMMX has higher volatility (0.71%) compared to FIMIX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIMIX dropped -12.52% vs FDMMX's -18.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.