PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIMIX vs. FDMMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund (FIMIX) and Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (FDMMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIMIX achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than FDMMX's -0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FIMIX has outperformed FDMMX with an annualized return of 1.59%, while FDMMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.45% annualized return.


FIMIX

1D
-0.27%
1M
-2.05%
6M
-1.41%
YTD
-0.67%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
3.12%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
1.59%
ALL TIME*
3.29%

FDMMX

1D
-0.26%
1M
-2.16%
6M
-0.70%
YTD
-0.05%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
3.24%
5Y*
0.28%
10Y*
1.45%
ALL TIME*
4.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIMIX
Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund
-0.67%5.80%1.22%5.02%-8.12%0.40%4.49%7.13%0.65%4.55%
FDMMX
Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund
-0.05%5.24%1.27%5.76%-9.67%1.11%4.27%7.09%-0.13%5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FIMIX and FDMMX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.90

The correlation between FIMIX and FDMMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIMIX vs. FDMMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIMIX
FIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FDMMX
FDMMX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FDMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FDMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund (FIMIX) and Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (FDMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIMIXFDMMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.47

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.83

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.03

5.79

-1.76

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FDMMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIMIX and FDMMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIMIX drawdown since its inception was -12.52%, smaller than the maximum FDMMX drawdown of -18.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIMIX and FDMMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIMIXFDMMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.52%

-18.98%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

-2.91%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

-4.37%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.52%

-13.70%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.52%

-13.70%

+1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-2.16%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-2.35%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

0.92%

+0.21%

Volatility

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund (FIMIX) has a higher volatility of 0.95% compared to Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (FDMMX) at 0.90%. This indicates that FIMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDMMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIMIXFDMMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

0.90%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

2.25%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75%

2.68%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.58%

3.69%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.65%

3.85%

-0.20%

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIMIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FDMMX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIMIX vs. FDMMX - Dividend Comparison

FIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than FDMMX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDMMX
Fidelity Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund
2.54%3.54%2.67%2.43%1.46%2.31%2.23%2.63%2.76%2.99%4.56%3.20%
FIMIX
Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund
2.50%3.57%2.66%2.29%1.44%1.81%2.12%2.56%2.63%2.53%3.25%2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIMIX and FDMMX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIMIX has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to FDMMX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIMIX dropped -12.52% vs FDMMX's -18.98%.

FDMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIMIX and FDMMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer