PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIMIX vs. FUEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIMIX vs. FUEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund (FIMIX) and Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund (FUEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIMIX achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than FUEMX's 1.20% return.


FIMIX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.49%
YTD
1.09%
6M
1.51%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
1.83%

FUEMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.20%
6M
1.47%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIMIX vs. FUEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIMIX
Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund
1.09%5.80%1.22%5.02%-8.12%0.40%4.49%7.13%0.65%0.63%
FUEMX
Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund
1.20%3.43%3.56%3.55%0.05%0.34%1.08%2.50%1.77%0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FIMIX and FUEMX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2017

0.48

The correlation between FIMIX and FUEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIMIX vs. FUEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIMIX
FIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FUEMX
FUEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FUEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FUEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIMIX vs. FUEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund (FIMIX) and Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund (FUEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIMIXFUEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

3.25

-1.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

10.76

-8.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.36

42.26

-35.90

FIMIX vs. FUEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FUEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIMIX and FUEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIMIX vs. FUEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIMIX drawdown since its inception was -12.52%, which is greater than FUEMX's maximum drawdown of -1.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIMIX and FUEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIMIXFUEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.52%

-1.99%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

-0.30%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.07%

-1.20%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.52%

-1.20%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

0.00%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-0.11%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

0.08%

+0.94%

Volatility

FIMIX vs. FUEMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund (FIMIX) has a higher volatility of 0.70% compared to Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund (FUEMX) at 0.26%. This indicates that FIMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIMIXFUEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

0.26%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.08%

0.71%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59%

1.01%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.56%

1.18%

+2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.65%

1.06%

+2.59%

FIMIX vs. FUEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIMIX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FUEMX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIMIX vs. FUEMX - Dividend Comparison

FIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than FUEMX's 3.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIMIX
Fidelity Minnesota Municipal Income Fund
2.68%3.57%2.66%2.29%1.44%1.81%2.12%2.56%2.63%2.53%3.25%2.90%
FUEMX
Fidelity Flex Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund
3.03%3.17%3.49%2.87%0.75%0.44%0.97%1.97%1.75%0.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIMIX and FUEMX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIMIX has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to FUEMX (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIMIX dropped -12.52% vs FUEMX's -1.99%.

FUEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIMIX and FUEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer