PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIL-USD vs. TON-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FIL-USD vs. TON-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FilecoinFutures (FIL-USD) and Toncoin (TON-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIL-USD achieves a -44.67% return, which is significantly lower than TON-USD's -14.63% return.


FIL-USD

1D
2.29%
1M
-11.17%
6M
-30.62%
YTD
-44.67%
1Y
-68.50%
3Y*
-44.13%
5Y*
-57.92%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-27.47%

TON-USD

1D
1.72%
1M
-16.15%
6M
6.01%
YTD
-14.63%
1Y
-60.01%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$44.60M$42.27M$103.05M

TON-USD

Toncoin
$185.50M$186.29M$540.17M

FIL-USD vs. TON-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FIL-USD
FilecoinFutures
-44.67%-73.81%-28.62%130.09%-91.21%-52.66%
TON-USD
Toncoin
-14.63%-69.91%138.49%6.02%-40.95%609.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FIL-USD and TON-USD is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021

0.46

The correlation between FIL-USD and TON-USD shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIL-USD vs. TON-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIL-USD
FIL-USD Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FIL-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIL-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIL-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FIL-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIL-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TON-USD
TON-USD Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TON-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TON-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TON-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TON-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TON-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIL-USD vs. TON-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FilecoinFutures (FIL-USD) and Toncoin (TON-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIL-USDTON-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.89

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

-0.91

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.14

-1.20

+0.06

FIL-USD vs. TON-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIL-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is comparable to the TON-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIL-USD and TON-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIL-USD vs. TON-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIL-USD drawdown since its inception was -99.64%, which is greater than TON-USD's maximum drawdown of -85.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIL-USD and TON-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIL-USDTON-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.64%

-85.31%

-14.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.77%

-66.23%

-13.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.08%

-85.31%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.62%

-82.69%

-16.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.20%

-52.95%

-29.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.62%

29.38%

+12.24%

Volatility

FIL-USD vs. TON-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FilecoinFutures (FIL-USD) is 15.21%, while Toncoin (TON-USD) has a volatility of 16.48%. This indicates that FIL-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TON-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIL-USDTON-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.21%

16.48%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.52%

61.81%

-3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.90%

66.60%

+34.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.62%

90.00%

-3.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

130.82%

90.00%

+40.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIL-USD and TON-USD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TON-USD has higher volatility (16.48%) compared to FIL-USD (15.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIL-USD dropped -99.64% vs TON-USD's -85.31%.

FIL-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIL-USD and TON-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer