PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIKQX vs. JCBUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIKQX vs. JCBUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) and JPMorgan Core Bond Fund Class R6 (JCBUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKQX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than JCBUX's 0.22% return.


FIKQX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.20%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
0.29%
10Y*

JCBUX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.28%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
2.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIKQX vs. JCBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIKQX
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z
0.24%7.31%1.69%6.75%-13.97%-1.03%10.00%9.90%2.01%
JCBUX
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund Class R6
0.22%7.55%2.25%5.85%-12.18%-0.95%8.28%8.59%2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKQX and JCBUX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.93

The correlation between FIKQX and JCBUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIKQX vs. JCBUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIKQX
FIKQX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FIKQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

JCBUX
JCBUX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
JCBUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCBUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCBUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
JCBUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCBUX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIKQX vs. JCBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) and JPMorgan Core Bond Fund Class R6 (JCBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIKQXJCBUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.80

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.89

5.33

-0.44

FIKQX vs. JCBUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the JCBUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKQX and JCBUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIKQXJCBUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.35

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.10

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.82

-0.33

Drawdowns

FIKQX vs. JCBUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKQX drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, which is greater than JCBUX's maximum drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKQX and JCBUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIKQXJCBUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-16.46%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-2.96%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-5.81%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-16.46%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-1.85%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-2.29%

-2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.00%

+0.04%

Volatility

FIKQX vs. JCBUX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to JPMorgan Core Bond Fund Class R6 (JCBUX) at 1.27%. This indicates that FIKQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JCBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIKQXJCBUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

1.27%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

2.76%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

3.92%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.00%

5.68%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.48%

4.68%

+0.80%

FIKQX vs. JCBUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKQX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than JCBUX's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIKQX vs. JCBUX - Dividend Comparison

FIKQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, less than JCBUX's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKQX
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z
4.01%3.97%4.08%3.65%2.05%1.44%4.90%2.83%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JCBUX
JPMorgan Core Bond Fund Class R6
4.23%4.12%4.12%3.66%2.85%2.98%4.15%3.37%3.06%3.03%3.07%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FIKQX and JCBUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIKQX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to JCBUX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKQX dropped -18.53% vs JCBUX's -16.46%.

JCBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIKQX and JCBUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer