FIKMX vs. RFI
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI).
FIKMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. RFI is managed by Cohen & Steers.
Performance
FIKMX vs. RFI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIKMX vs. RFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 0.41% | 7.29% | 8.03% | 9.51% | -14.48% | 19.04% | -0.98% | 18.04% | -1.71% |
RFI Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund | 2.96% | 3.55% | 6.63% | 4.36% | -22.13% | 39.21% | -0.79% | 44.46% | -5.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKMX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than RFI's 2.96% return.
FIKMX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- —
RFI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- -3.98%
- 1Y
- -0.08%
- 3Y*
- 5.53%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- 6.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIKMX vs. RFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
FIKMX vs. RFI — Risk / Return Rank
FIKMX
RFI
FIKMX vs. RFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) and Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIKMX | RFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | -0.01 | +1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 0.10 | +1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.01 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 0.01 | +1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 0.02 | +4.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIKMX | RFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | -0.01 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.11 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.33 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKMX and RFI is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FIKMX vs. RFI - Dividend Comparison
FIKMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than RFI's 8.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 4.78% | 4.80% | 4.81% | 5.15% | 6.24% | 1.59% | 4.90% | 5.82% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFI Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund | 8.62% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 8.17% | 10.02% | 6.82% | 7.61% | 6.63% | 8.93% | 7.52% | 7.93% | 10.36% |
Drawdowns
FIKMX vs. RFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKMX drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, smaller than the maximum RFI drawdown of -73.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKMX and RFI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKMX | RFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -73.67% | +39.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.35% | -11.28% | +6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | -34.38% | +16.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.72% | -7.93% | +5.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -12.15% | +6.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 4.14% | -3.10% |
Volatility
FIKMX vs. RFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) is 1.67%, while Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund (RFI) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that FIKMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIKMX | RFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.67% | 5.03% | -3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.90% | 8.88% | -5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.96% | 15.55% | -10.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.52% | 20.41% | -13.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.69% | 25.14% | -14.45% |