FIKHX vs. FSPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX).
FIKHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. FSPGX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FIKHX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIKHX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 24.77% | 35.52% | 59.89% | -35.93% | 27.74% | 64.56% | 51.18% | -17.39% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.77% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -11.75% |
Returns By Period
FIKHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSPGX
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -9.77%
- 6M
- -9.26%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 21.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIKHX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKHX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIKHX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
FIKHX
FSPGX
FIKHX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIKHX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.80 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKHX and FSPGX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIKHX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
FIKHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, more than FSPGX's 0.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKHX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z | 9.85% | 9.85% | 7.33% | 3.86% | 3.32% | 11.52% | 7.42% | 2.64% | 22.38% | 0.00% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.38% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% |
Drawdowns
FIKHX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKHX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -32.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -13.03% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.43% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.70% | — |
Volatility
FIKHX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIKHX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 22.58% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.52% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.66% | — |