FIKGX vs. TEFQX
FIKGX (Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z) and TEFQX (Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FIKGX returned 37.19%/yr vs -19.63%/yr for TEFQX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIKGX charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for TEFQX.
Performance
FIKGX vs. TEFQX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKGX achieves a 54.77% return, which is significantly higher than TEFQX's -6.30% return.
FIKGX
- 1D
- -4.57%
- 1M
- -12.73%
- 6M
- 41.14%
- YTD
- 54.77%
- 1Y
- 93.63%
- 3Y*
- 45.49%
- 5Y*
- 37.19%
- 10Y*
- —
TEFQX
- 1D
- -5.14%
- 1M
- -14.47%
- 6M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 1Y
- -8.35%
- 3Y*
- -2.89%
- 5Y*
- -19.63%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
FIKGX vs. TEFQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z | 54.77% | 45.43% | 35.88% | 75.75% | -34.81% | 58.07% | 44.21% | 64.45% | -11.11% |
TEFQX Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund | -6.30% | 29.82% | -22.02% | 10.81% | -60.11% | -16.48% | 97.04% | 28.50% | -10.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKGX and TEFQX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.67 |
The correlation between FIKGX and TEFQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIKGX vs. TEFQX — Risk / Return Rank
FIKGX
TEFQX
FIKGX vs. TEFQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) and Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund (TEFQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIKGX | TEFQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.00 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.34 | -0.23 | +5.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.21 | -0.52 | +19.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIKGX vs. TEFQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKGX drawdown since its inception was -45.98%, smaller than the maximum TEFQX drawdown of -92.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKGX and TEFQX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKGX | TEFQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.98% | -92.33% | +46.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.02% | -29.26% | +11.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.67% | -61.62% | +21.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.98% | -79.25% | +33.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.02% | -70.98% | +52.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -60.15% | +50.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 12.63% | -7.63% |
Volatility
FIKGX vs. TEFQX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) has a higher volatility of 18.03% compared to Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund (TEFQX) at 12.00%. This indicates that FIKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEFQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIKGX | TEFQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.03% | 12.00% | +6.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.82% | 30.41% | +2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.06% | 37.12% | +1.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.63% | 74.33% | -34.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.95% | 55.69% | -16.74% |
FIKGX vs. TEFQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKGX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than TEFQX's 1.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIKGX vs. TEFQX - Dividend Comparison
FIKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, while TEFQX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z | 4.31% | 6.67% | 0.00% | 3.14% | 3.08% | 4.19% | 4.54% | 1.08% | 19.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TEFQX Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.91% | 54.72% | 6.88% | 15.27% | 5.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 27.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIKGX and TEFQX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIKGX has higher volatility (18.03%) compared to TEFQX (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKGX dropped -45.98% vs TEFQX's -92.33%.
FIKGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIKGX and TEFQX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer