FIKGX vs. FNILX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX).

FIKGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. FNILX is managed by Fidelity.

Performance

FIKGX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FIKGX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z	7.52%	45.43%	35.88%	75.75%	-34.81%	58.07%	44.21%	64.45%	-11.11%
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund	-4.59%	17.81%	25.47%	27.45%	-19.37%	26.67%	21.13%	31.79%	-10.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKGX achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly higher than FNILX's -4.59% return.

FIKGX

• 1D: 7.13%
• 1M: -4.44%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 6M: 14.55%
• 1Y: 88.96%
• 3Y*: 38.99%
• 5Y*: 27.65%
• 10Y*: —

FNILX

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -4.98%
• YTD: -4.59%
• 6M: -2.55%
• 1Y: 17.28%
• 3Y*: 18.57%
• 5Y*: 11.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIKGX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKGX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.

FIKGX

Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z

FNILX

Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund

Return for Risk

FIKGX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIKGX

FIKGX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FIKGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FIKGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FIKGX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FIKGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FIKGX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FNILX

FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIKGX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIKGX	FNILX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	0.97	+1.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	1.48	+1.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.23	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.22	1.51	+3.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.77	7.14	+12.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIKGX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKGX and FNILX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIKGX	FNILX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	0.97	+1.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.67	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.66	+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between FIKGX and FNILX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FIKGX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FIKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, more than FNILX's 1.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z	6.20%	6.67%	0.00%	3.14%	3.08%	4.19%	4.54%	1.08%	19.72%
FNILX Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund	1.06%	1.01%	1.09%	1.34%	1.53%	0.95%	1.20%	1.17%	0.53%

Drawdowns

FIKGX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKGX drawdown since its inception was -45.98%, which is greater than FNILX's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKGX and FNILX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIKGX	FNILX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.98%	-33.76%	-12.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.09%	-12.18%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.98%	-25.40%	-20.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.55%	-6.36%	-2.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.00%	-5.47%	-4.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	2.57%	+1.94%

Volatility

FIKGX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) has a higher volatility of 12.80% compared to Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) at 5.33%. This indicates that FIKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIKGX	FNILX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.80%	5.33%	+7.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.66%	9.59%	+16.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.19%	18.44%	+21.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.15%	17.27%	+20.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.39%	20.19%	+18.20%