FIKGX vs. AIO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIKGX (Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z) and AIO (Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FIKGX returned 42.39%/yr vs 13.20%/yr for AIO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIKGX charges 0.62%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for AIO.

Performance

FIKGX vs. AIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) and Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKGX achieves a 85.07% return, which is significantly higher than AIO's 30.26% return.

FIKGX

• 1D: 6.40%
• 1M: 26.22%
• YTD: 85.07%
• 6M: 82.97%
• 1Y: 170.50%
• 3Y*: 60.87%
• 5Y*: 42.39%
• 10Y*: —

AIO

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 11.21%
• YTD: 30.26%
• 6M: 29.79%
• 1Y: 29.76%
• 3Y*: 29.61%
• 5Y*: 13.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIKGX vs. AIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z	85.07%	45.43%	35.88%	75.75%	-34.81%	58.07%	44.21%	12.17%
AIO Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund	30.26%	0.48%	54.48%	19.27%	-28.06%	13.51%	46.27%	1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKGX and AIO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019	0.66

The correlation between FIKGX and AIO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIKGX vs. AIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIKGX

FIKGX Risk / Return Rank: 97
FIKGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
FIKGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FIKGX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FIKGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FIKGX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

AIO

AIO Risk / Return Rank: 36
AIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
AIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
AIO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
AIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AIO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIKGX vs. AIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) and Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIKGX	AIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.53	1.68	+3.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.35	2.41	+2.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.29	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.27	2.62	+9.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	47.80	7.77	+40.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIKGX vs. AIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKGX Sharpe Ratio is 5.53, which is higher than the AIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKGX and AIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIKGX	AIO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.53	1.68	+3.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.11	0.60	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	0.66	+0.42

Drawdowns

FIKGX vs. AIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKGX drawdown since its inception was -45.98%, roughly equal to the maximum AIO drawdown of -44.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKGX and AIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIKGX	AIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.98%	-44.88%	-1.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.64%	-11.42%	-3.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.67%	-30.23%	-9.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.98%	-37.39%	-8.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.81%	-10.96%	+1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.75%	3.84%	-0.09%

Volatility

FIKGX vs. AIO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) has a higher volatility of 11.90% compared to Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) at 5.68%. This indicates that FIKGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIKGX	AIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.90%	5.68%	+6.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.31%	13.37%	+11.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.52%	17.86%	+14.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.43%	22.04%	+16.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.39%	26.87%	+11.52%

FIKGX vs. AIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKGX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than AIO's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIKGX vs. AIO - Dividend Comparison

FIKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than AIO's 10.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AIO Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund	10.90%	13.75%	7.30%	10.34%	11.12%	19.97%	9.31%	0.54%	0.00%
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z	3.60%	6.67%	0.00%	3.14%	3.08%	4.19%	4.54%	1.08%	19.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIKGX and AIO in my portfolio?

FIKGX and AIO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIKGX or AIO?

FIKGX has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to AIO (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKGX dropped -45.98% vs AIO's -44.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIKGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.53 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.