FIKBX vs. FIDAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FIKBX (Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z) and FIDAX (John Hancock Financial Industries Fund) are both Financials Equities funds from BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, FIKBX returned 12.10%/yr vs 8.02%/yr for FIDAX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FIKBX charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for FIDAX.

Performance

FIKBX vs. FIDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) and John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKBX achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly higher than FIDAX's 2.64% return.

FIKBX

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 4.39%
• YTD: 3.00%
• 6M: 1.41%
• 1Y: 13.53%
• 3Y*: 24.29%
• 5Y*: 12.10%
• 10Y*: —

FIDAX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 2.64%
• 6M: 0.94%
• 1Y: 11.73%
• 3Y*: 20.57%
• 5Y*: 8.02%
• 10Y*: 11.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIKBX vs. FIDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z	3.00%	15.36%	32.80%	14.47%	-8.58%	33.43%	0.18%	34.31%	-11.43%
FIDAX John Hancock Financial Industries Fund	2.64%	12.05%	30.09%	5.01%	-14.17%	28.80%	1.58%	31.21%	-13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKBX and FIDAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.96

The correlation between FIKBX and FIDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIKBX vs. FIDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIKBX

FIKBX Risk / Return Rank: 13
FIKBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FIKBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
FIKBX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FIKBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FIKBX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

FIDAX

FIDAX Risk / Return Rank: 11
FIDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FIDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FIDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FIDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FIDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIKBX vs. FIDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) and John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIKBX	FIDAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	0.83	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	1.20	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.15	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	0.96	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.38	2.68	+0.70

FIKBX vs. FIDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the FIDAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKBX and FIDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIKBX vs. FIDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKBX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum FIDAX drawdown of -70.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKBX and FIDAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIKBX	FIDAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.95%	-70.42%	+24.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.96%	-13.82%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.38%	-19.35%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.82%	-30.89%	+6.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-0.85%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	-14.05%	+5.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.54%	4.95%	-0.41%

Volatility

FIKBX vs. FIDAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) and John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) have volatilities of 4.38% and 4.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIKBX	FIDAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	4.34%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.20%	12.52%	-0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.09%	16.15%	-0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.69%	20.66%	+0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.88%	21.98%	+3.90%

FIKBX vs. FIDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKBX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FIDAX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIKBX vs. FIDAX - Dividend Comparison

FIKBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, less than FIDAX's 46.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIDAX John Hancock Financial Industries Fund	46.95%	48.19%	10.24%	1.91%	11.22%	23.08%	5.41%	7.56%	7.72%	6.10%	6.01%	0.93%
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z	6.91%	7.11%	5.04%	2.48%	6.20%	4.43%	2.78%	1.59%	4.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIKBX and FIDAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FIKBX and FIDAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FIKBX or FIDAX?

FIKBX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to FIDAX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKBX dropped -45.95% vs FIDAX's -70.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIKBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.