PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIJYX vs. ETHSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIJYX vs. ETHSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class Z (FIJYX) and Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIJYX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than ETHSX's -8.58% return.


FIJYX

1D
1.44%
1M
-4.71%
YTD
0.75%
6M
-3.07%
1Y
47.49%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*

ETHSX

1D
0.41%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
-8.58%
6M
-7.33%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
2.72%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
6.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIJYX vs. ETHSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIJYX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class Z
0.75%40.09%0.03%11.19%-7.60%-2.76%32.72%26.25%-11.45%
ETHSX
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund
-8.58%10.23%3.48%5.67%-9.41%22.02%13.04%25.99%-6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FIJYX and ETHSX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.69

The correlation between FIJYX and ETHSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIJYX vs. ETHSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIJYX
FIJYX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FIJYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIJYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIJYX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FIJYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIJYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

ETHSX
ETHSX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ETHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIJYX vs. ETHSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class Z (FIJYX) and Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIJYXETHSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.04

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.31

0.24

+5.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.47

0.57

+14.89

FIJYX vs. ETHSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIJYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the ETHSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIJYX and ETHSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIJYXETHSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

0.19

+1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.19

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.10

+0.31

Drawdowns

FIJYX vs. ETHSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIJYX drawdown since its inception was -38.53%, smaller than the maximum ETHSX drawdown of -90.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJYX and ETHSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIJYXETHSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.53%

-90.06%

+51.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-12.35%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.39%

-18.91%

-17.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

-19.58%

-16.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.57%

-12.97%

+5.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.57%

-44.06%

+32.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

5.12%

-2.08%

Volatility

FIJYX vs. ETHSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class Z (FIJYX) has a higher volatility of 6.86% compared to Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund (ETHSX) at 4.37%. This indicates that FIJYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETHSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIJYXETHSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

4.37%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.63%

10.37%

+6.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.02%

15.06%

+6.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.59%

14.91%

+8.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.00%

16.24%

+8.76%

FIJYX vs. ETHSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIJYX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHSX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIJYX vs. ETHSX - Dividend Comparison

FIJYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than ETHSX's 8.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETHSX
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sciences Fund
8.06%7.36%4.81%2.48%4.43%8.25%7.33%5.39%5.51%2.82%12.75%9.70%
FIJYX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class Z
1.43%1.44%0.00%1.55%0.00%18.90%8.13%6.49%2.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIJYX and ETHSX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIJYX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to ETHSX (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIJYX dropped -38.53% vs ETHSX's -90.06%.

FIJYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIJYX and ETHSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer