FIJWX vs. RPHIX
FIJWX (Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class Z) and RPHIX (RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FIJWX returned 4.52%/yr vs 4.61%/yr for RPHIX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIJWX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RPHIX.
Performance
FIJWX vs. RPHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIJWX achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly higher than RPHIX's 1.87% return.
FIJWX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 8.64%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.52%
- 10Y*
- —
RPHIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
FIJWX vs. RPHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIJWX Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class Z | 2.98% | 7.84% | 8.30% | 10.24% | -7.26% | 2.86% | 3.97% | 9.53% | -2.92% |
RPHIX RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund | 1.87% | 4.76% | 6.71% | 5.87% | 2.97% | 2.05% | 1.95% | 2.77% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIJWX and RPHIX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.27 |
The correlation between FIJWX and RPHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIJWX vs. RPHIX — Risk / Return Rank
FIJWX
RPHIX
FIJWX vs. RPHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class Z (FIJWX) and RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIJWX | RPHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | 3.74 | -1.98 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.19 | 43.68 | -38.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.15 | 111.08 | -84.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIJWX vs. RPHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIJWX drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, which is greater than RPHIX's maximum drawdown of -3.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJWX and RPHIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIJWX | RPHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.77% | -3.16% | -13.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.67% | -0.10% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.18% | -0.72% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.28% | -0.92% | -8.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -3.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | 0.00% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -0.09% | -1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | 0.04% | +0.29% |
Volatility
FIJWX vs. RPHIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class Z (FIJWX) has a higher volatility of 0.86% compared to RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) at 0.22%. This indicates that FIJWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIJWX | RPHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | 0.22% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.32% | 0.60% | +1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93% | 0.88% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.84% | 1.26% | +2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.64% | 1.20% | +3.44% |
FIJWX vs. RPHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIJWX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than RPHIX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIJWX vs. RPHIX - Dividend Comparison
FIJWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than RPHIX's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIJWX Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class Z | 7.38% | 7.45% | 6.59% | 6.04% | 2.92% | 2.93% | 3.57% | 4.30% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPHIX RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund | 4.07% | 4.76% | 6.40% | 5.08% | 3.46% | 2.03% | 2.44% | 2.85% | 2.83% | 2.68% | 2.63% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIJWX and RPHIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIJWX has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to RPHIX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIJWX dropped -16.77% vs RPHIX's -3.16%.
RPHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIJWX and RPHIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer