PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIJRX vs. FRQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIJRX vs. FRQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z (FIJRX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIJRX achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly higher than FRQAX's 3.51% return.


FIJRX

1D
-0.24%
1M
2.90%
YTD
13.04%
6M
12.56%
1Y
27.81%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*

FRQAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.65%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.48%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
4.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIJRX vs. FRQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIJRX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z
13.04%23.10%13.81%19.32%-17.81%16.07%17.70%26.72%-12.77%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
3.51%9.54%4.21%8.24%-12.60%3.56%9.32%12.33%-2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FIJRX and FRQAX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.81

The correlation between FIJRX and FRQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIJRX vs. FRQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIJRX
FIJRX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FIJRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIJRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIJRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FIJRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIJRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQAX
FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIJRX vs. FRQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z (FIJRX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIJRXFRQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.66

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

11.08

+1.64

FIJRX vs. FRQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIJRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the FRQAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIJRX and FRQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIJRX vs. FRQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIJRX drawdown since its inception was -31.28%, smaller than the maximum FRQAX drawdown of -38.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJRX and FRQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIJRXFRQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.28%

-38.22%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-3.46%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-5.27%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.22%

-17.24%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.43%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-4.56%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

0.83%

+1.44%

Volatility

FIJRX vs. FRQAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z (FIJRX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) at 1.67%. This indicates that FIJRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIJRXFRQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

1.67%

+3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

3.68%

+7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

4.36%

+9.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

5.59%

+9.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

5.34%

+11.65%

FIJRX vs. FRQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIJRX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQAX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIJRX vs. FRQAX - Dividend Comparison

FIJRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than FRQAX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIJRX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class Z
6.73%6.09%1.84%1.68%11.24%9.69%5.48%7.26%2.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
2.99%2.72%2.71%2.46%4.74%5.76%3.26%2.93%5.33%16.05%2.18%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIJRX and FRQAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIJRX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to FRQAX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIJRX dropped -31.28% vs FRQAX's -38.22%.

FIJRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIJRX and FRQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer