PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIJDX vs. INIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIJDX vs. INIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) and VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIJDX achieves a -10.74% return, which is significantly lower than INIVX's -7.87% return.


FIJDX

1D
-4.33%
1M
-15.15%
YTD
-10.74%
6M
-14.51%
1Y
40.06%
3Y*
36.46%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*

INIVX

1D
-4.11%
1M
-14.68%
YTD
-7.87%
6M
-11.70%
1Y
56.39%
3Y*
43.83%
5Y*
20.22%
10Y*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIJDX vs. INIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIJDX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z
-10.74%143.25%15.10%-0.26%-13.32%-10.33%27.00%35.74%4.09%
INIVX
VanEck International Investors Gold Fund
-7.87%165.88%14.37%9.67%-13.77%-14.23%40.91%38.15%0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FIJDX and INIVX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.97

The correlation between FIJDX and INIVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIJDX vs. INIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIJDX
FIJDX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FIJDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIJDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIJDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FIJDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIJDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

INIVX
INIVX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
INIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
INIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
INIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
INIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIJDX vs. INIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) and VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIJDXINIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

1.69

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

4.55

-1.56

FIJDX vs. INIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIJDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the INIVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIJDX and INIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIJDX vs. INIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIJDX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, smaller than the maximum INIVX drawdown of -78.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJDX and INIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIJDXINIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.43%

-78.96%

+28.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.39%

-33.60%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.39%

-33.60%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.91%

-44.66%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.63%

-32.39%

-2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.54%

-37.75%

+19.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.41%

12.45%

+0.96%

Volatility

FIJDX vs. INIVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z (FIJDX) and VanEck International Investors Gold Fund (INIVX) have volatilities of 18.10% and 17.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIJDXINIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.10%

17.28%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.30%

40.44%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.49%

47.04%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.20%

34.73%

-0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.70%

34.25%

+0.45%

FIJDX vs. INIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIJDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than INIVX's 1.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIJDX vs. INIVX - Dividend Comparison

FIJDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, less than INIVX's 6.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FIJDX
Fidelity Advisor Gold Fund Class Z
5.74%2.17%3.63%1.16%0.38%1.71%4.54%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INIVX
VanEck International Investors Gold Fund
6.53%6.01%7.45%0.10%0.00%6.40%11.70%3.66%2.87%3.76%6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FIJDX and INIVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIJDX has higher volatility (18.10%) compared to INIVX (17.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIJDX dropped -50.43% vs INIVX's -78.96%.

INIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIJDX and INIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer