FIJBX vs. NMTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIJBX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX).
FIJBX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. NMTRX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 30, 2007.
Performance
FIJBX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIJBX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIJBX Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z | -0.82% | 5.78% | 2.00% | 6.18% | -9.60% | 1.42% | 4.53% | 7.63% | 2.55% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | -0.12% | 3.90% | 1.99% | 6.21% | -11.98% | 2.69% | 5.25% | 9.26% | 2.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIJBX achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than NMTRX's -0.12% return.
FIJBX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.98%
- 10Y*
- —
NMTRX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 3.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIJBX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIJBX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIJBX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank
FIJBX
NMTRX
FIJBX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIJBX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIJBX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 0.84 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 1.16 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.23 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 0.99 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | 2.89 | +1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIJBX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.84 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.10 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.97 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIJBX and NMTRX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIJBX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison
FIJBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than NMTRX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIJBX Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z | 3.03% | 3.90% | 2.88% | 2.46% | 1.69% | 2.31% | 2.82% | 2.85% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NMTRX Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts | 4.19% | 4.46% | 3.55% | 3.67% | 3.28% | 2.73% | 2.92% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 3.28% | 3.71% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
FIJBX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIJBX drawdown since its inception was -14.03%, smaller than the maximum NMTRX drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJBX and NMTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIJBX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -16.36% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -4.75% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.03% | -16.36% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -2.25% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -2.93% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 1.62% | -0.23% |
Volatility
FIJBX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor California Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIJBX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) at 1.07%. This indicates that FIJBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIJBX | NMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 1.07% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.86% | 1.82% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.04% | 4.93% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 3.97% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 4.38% | +0.10% |