PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIJAX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIJAX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIJAX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIJAX achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 15.53% return.


FIJAX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.82%
YTD
1.82%
6M
2.26%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*

FTIHX

1D
0.70%
1M
5.76%
YTD
15.53%
6M
18.30%
1Y
33.42%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIJAX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIJAX
Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class Z
1.82%5.08%1.62%7.19%-11.08%2.42%4.11%7.85%2.55%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
15.53%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-6.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FIJAX and FTIHX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.07

Over the past year, FIJAX and FTIHX have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIJAX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIJAX
FIJAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FIJAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIJAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIJAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FIJAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIJAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIJAX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIJAX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIJAXFTIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.43

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.93

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.31

11.54

-3.24

FIJAX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIJAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is comparable to the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIJAX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIJAXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

2.31

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.58

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.63

-0.07

Drawdowns

FIJAX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIJAX drawdown since its inception was -16.02%, smaller than the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIJAX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIJAXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.02%

-35.75%

+19.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.32%

-11.25%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.46%

-13.15%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.02%

-29.99%

+13.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

0.00%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-7.22%

+3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

2.85%

-1.88%

Volatility

FIJAX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class Z (FIJAX) is 1.26%, while Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that FIJAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIJAXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

4.76%

-3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.38%

12.02%

-9.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06%

14.30%

-11.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.35%

15.27%

-10.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

16.05%

-11.32%

FIJAX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIJAX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIJAX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FIJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than FTIHX's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FIJAX
Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class Z
2.95%3.82%2.83%2.43%1.82%2.55%2.81%2.89%0.86%0.00%0.00%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.41%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIJAX and FTIHX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTIHX has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to FIJAX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIJAX dropped -16.02% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FIJAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIJAX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer