FIIMX vs. FSPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I (FIIMX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX).
FIIMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 12, 2004. FSPGX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FIIMX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIIMX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIIMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I | 4.95% | 7.71% | 17.21% | 15.01% | -14.80% | 25.26% | 18.68% | 23.72% | -14.97% | 19.63% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.77% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -1.79% | 27.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIIMX achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's -9.77% return.
FIIMX
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 25.58%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
FSPGX
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -9.77%
- 6M
- -9.26%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 21.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIIMX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIIMX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIIMX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
FIIMX
FSPGX
FIIMX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I (FIIMX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIIMX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.18 | 0.84 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.69 | 1.36 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.17 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | 4.02 | +3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIIMX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 0.84 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.58 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.80 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIIMX and FSPGX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIIMX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
FIIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than FSPGX's 0.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIIMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I | 6.55% | 6.06% | 6.79% | 2.71% | 5.70% | 18.41% | 1.29% | 3.30% | 10.56% | 7.67% | 4.84% | 4.76% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.38% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FIIMX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIIMX drawdown since its inception was -53.22%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIIMX and FSPGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIIMX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.22% | -32.66% | -20.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.84% | -16.17% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.06% | -32.66% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.57% | -13.03% | +6.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.12% | -6.43% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 4.70% | -1.32% |
Volatility
FIIMX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I (FIIMX) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 6.71%. This indicates that FIIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIIMX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | 6.71% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.89% | 12.37% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.29% | 22.58% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.29% | 21.52% | -1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 21.66% | -0.72% |