FIIMX vs. AASCX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FIIMX (Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I) and AASCX (Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FIIMX returned 11.79%/yr vs 10.69%/yr for AASCX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIIMX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for AASCX.

Performance

FIIMX vs. AASCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I (FIIMX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIIMX achieves a 21.25% return, which is significantly higher than AASCX's 15.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FIIMX has outperformed AASCX with an annualized return of 11.79%, while AASCX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.69% annualized return.

FIIMX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 21.25%
• 6M: 21.32%
• 1Y: 38.56%
• 3Y*: 19.43%
• 5Y*: 10.07%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

AASCX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 3.61%
• YTD: 15.34%
• 6M: 14.67%
• 1Y: 21.00%
• 3Y*: 14.82%
• 5Y*: 6.85%
• 10Y*: 10.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIIMX vs. AASCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIIMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I	21.25%	7.71%	17.21%	15.01%	-14.80%	25.26%	18.68%	23.72%	-14.97%	20.62%
AASCX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund	15.34%	4.43%	14.60%	13.65%	-17.85%	27.70%	21.68%	24.51%	-10.73%	8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between FIIMX and AASCX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2004	0.94

The correlation between FIIMX and AASCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIIMX vs. AASCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIIMX

FIIMX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FIIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
FIIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FIIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FIIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FIIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

AASCX

AASCX Risk / Return Rank: 31
AASCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
AASCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
AASCX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
AASCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
AASCX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIIMX vs. AASCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I (FIIMX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIIMX	AASCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	1.47	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	2.15	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.26	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.90	2.32	+1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.69	8.38	+7.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIIMX vs. AASCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIIMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the AASCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIIMX and AASCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIIMX	AASCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	1.47	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.33	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.51	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.38	+0.15

Drawdowns

FIIMX vs. AASCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIIMX drawdown since its inception was -53.22%, smaller than the maximum AASCX drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIIMX and AASCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIIMX	AASCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.22%	-56.55%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.83%	-9.01%	-0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.06%	-20.23%	-7.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.06%	-32.80%	+4.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.29%	-40.67%	-1.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	0.00%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	-10.68%	+2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.49%	-0.05%

Volatility

FIIMX vs. AASCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I (FIIMX) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) at 3.39%. This indicates that FIIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AASCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIIMX	AASCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	3.39%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.74%	10.87%	+2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.14%	14.32%	+2.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.33%	20.83%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.99%	20.86%	+0.13%

FIIMX vs. AASCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIIMX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than AASCX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIIMX vs. AASCX - Dividend Comparison

FIIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than AASCX's 12.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AASCX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund	12.98%	14.98%	9.22%	1.54%	3.15%	12.54%	3.54%	2.92%	12.94%	0.09%	0.10%	0.00%
FIIMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class I	5.67%	6.06%	6.79%	2.71%	5.70%	18.41%	1.29%	3.30%	10.56%	7.67%	4.84%	4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIIMX and AASCX in my portfolio?

FIIMX and AASCX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIIMX or AASCX?

FIIMX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to AASCX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIIMX dropped -53.22% vs AASCX's -56.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.