PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIIIX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIIIX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I (FIIIX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIIIX achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FIIIX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 9.26%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.43% annualized return.


FIIIX

1D
1.21%
1M
3.14%
YTD
7.15%
6M
8.39%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
9.26%

FCNTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.65%
YTD
7.76%
6M
10.05%
1Y
23.72%
3Y*
26.93%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
17.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIIIX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIIIX
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I
7.15%17.90%4.86%20.87%-23.21%15.45%16.95%34.01%-11.52%28.79%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
7.76%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FIIIX and FCNTX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2007

0.81

The correlation between FIIIX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIIIX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIIIX
FIIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FIIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FIIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIIIX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I (FIIIX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIIIXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.31

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

2.13

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

9.04

-5.26

FIIIX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIIIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIIIX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIIIXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.72

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.79

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.89

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.78

-0.48

Drawdowns

FIIIX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIIIX drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIIIX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIIIXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.97%

-49.19%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.99%

-11.30%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

-19.75%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.95%

-32.59%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

-32.59%

-2.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-0.53%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.43%

-8.16%

-2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

2.65%

+1.13%

Volatility

FIIIX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I (FIIIX) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) at 3.26%. This indicates that FIIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIIIXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

3.26%

+4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

10.48%

+5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

14.03%

+4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.06%

19.15%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.83%

19.68%

-1.85%

FIIIX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIIIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIIIX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FIIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than FCNTX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.33%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FIIIX
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class I
3.21%3.44%0.78%0.47%1.65%1.93%0.12%1.00%0.91%0.12%1.28%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIIIX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIIIX has higher volatility (7.30%) compared to FCNTX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIIIX dropped -55.97% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIIIX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer