FIHFX vs. URSIX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FIHFX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class) and URSIX (USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FIHFX returned 9.87%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for URSIX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FIHFX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for URSIX.

Performance

FIHFX vs. URSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) and USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIHFX achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than URSIX's 13.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIHFX having a 9.87% annualized return and URSIX not far ahead at 10.23%.

FIHFX

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: -0.63%
• 6M: 5.01%
• YTD: 7.21%
• 1Y: 16.01%
• 3Y*: 13.06%
• 5Y*: 6.91%
• 10Y*: 9.87%
• ALL TIME*: 9.24%

URSIX

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: 0.56%
• 6M: 9.91%
• YTD: 13.54%
• 1Y: 25.18%
• 3Y*: 16.85%
• 5Y*: 9.74%
• 10Y*: 10.23%
• ALL TIME*: 8.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIHFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
URSIX USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FIHFX vs. URSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIHFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class	7.21%	17.32%	11.22%	17.25%	-17.49%	13.73%	15.54%	24.87%	-6.77%	20.35%
URSIX USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund	13.54%	19.62%	13.05%	18.22%	-15.78%	17.70%	10.17%	20.09%	-9.17%	19.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FIHFX and URSIX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2013	0.97

The correlation between FIHFX and URSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIHFX vs. URSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIHFX

FIHFX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FIHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FIHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FIHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FIHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FIHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

URSIX

URSIX Risk / Return Rank: 81
URSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
URSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
URSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
URSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
URSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIHFX vs. URSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) and USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIHFX	URSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	1.88	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	2.65	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.34	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	2.81	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.90	12.09	-3.19

FIHFX vs. URSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIHFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the URSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIHFX and URSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIHFX vs. URSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIHFX drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, smaller than the maximum URSIX drawdown of -30.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIHFX and URSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIHFX	URSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.42%	-30.33%	+1.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.99%	-8.32%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.98%	-14.35%	+3.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.84%	-23.85%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.42%	-30.33%	+1.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-0.28%	-1.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.96%	-4.40%	+0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	1.93%	-0.23%

Volatility

FIHFX vs. URSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) is 2.83%, while USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund (URSIX) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that FIHFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIHFX	URSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	3.06%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.19%	10.34%	-2.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.70%	12.45%	-2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.02%	14.21%	-2.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.31%	14.52%	-1.21%

FIHFX vs. URSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIHFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than URSIX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FIHFX vs. URSIX - Dividend Comparison

FIHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than URSIX's 4.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIHFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class	2.60%	2.77%	2.50%	2.10%	2.14%	1.93%	2.15%	16.14%	2.21%	1.81%	1.95%	2.03%
URSIX USAA Target Retirement 2060 Fund	4.93%	5.60%	2.55%	2.89%	10.97%	7.07%	4.79%	5.88%	4.77%	3.82%	3.01%	1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIHFX and URSIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FIHFX and URSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FIHFX or URSIX?

URSIX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to FIHFX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIHFX dropped -28.42% vs URSIX's -30.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.