FIHFX vs. FIPFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX).
FIHFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009. FIPFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009.
Performance
FIHFX vs. FIPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIHFX vs. FIPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIHFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class | -1.09% | 17.32% | 11.22% | 17.25% | -17.49% | 13.73% | 15.54% | 24.87% | -6.77% | 20.35% |
FIPFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class | -1.55% | 21.40% | 14.15% | 19.91% | -18.22% | 15.93% | 16.46% | 26.02% | -7.28% | 20.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIHFX achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly higher than FIPFX's -1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FIHFX has underperformed FIPFX with an annualized return of 9.56%, while FIPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.68% annualized return.
FIHFX
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
FIPFX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- -1.55%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 19.20%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIHFX vs. FIPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FIHFX and FIPFX have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FIHFX vs. FIPFX — Risk / Return Rank
FIHFX
FIPFX
FIHFX vs. FIPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIHFX | FIPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 1.87 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 1.82 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.38 | 8.32 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIHFX | FIPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.57 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.71 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.66 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIHFX and FIPFX is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIHFX vs. FIPFX - Dividend Comparison
FIHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than FIPFX's 2.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIHFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class | 2.80% | 2.77% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.14% | 1.93% | 2.15% | 16.14% | 2.21% | 1.81% | 1.95% | 2.03% |
FIPFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class | 2.01% | 1.97% | 2.00% | 1.94% | 2.02% | 1.93% | 1.95% | 15.16% | 2.28% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 2.00% |
Drawdowns
FIHFX vs. FIPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIHFX drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, smaller than the maximum FIPFX drawdown of -30.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIHFX and FIPFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIHFX | FIPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.42% | -30.71% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -10.81% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.84% | -26.20% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.42% | -30.71% | +2.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.12% | -6.51% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -4.24% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.37% | -0.51% |
Volatility
FIHFX vs. FIPFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) is 4.47%, while Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that FIHFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIHFX | FIPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 5.83% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.79% | 9.08% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.54% | 15.37% | -3.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 14.32% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 15.12% | -1.76% |