FIHFX vs. TLYIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund (TLYIX).
FIHFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2009. TLYIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009.
Performance
FIHFX vs. TLYIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIHFX vs. TLYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIHFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class | -1.09% | 17.32% | 11.22% | 17.25% | -17.49% | 13.73% | 15.54% | 24.87% | -6.77% | 20.35% |
TLYIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund | -1.23% | 17.02% | 11.83% | 17.24% | -16.30% | 13.19% | 15.53% | 23.03% | -5.76% | 16.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIHFX achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly higher than TLYIX's -1.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIHFX having a 9.56% annualized return and TLYIX not far behind at 9.16%.
FIHFX
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.56%
TLYIX
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIHFX vs. TLYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIHFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than TLYIX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FIHFX vs. TLYIX — Risk / Return Rank
FIHFX
TLYIX
FIHFX vs. TLYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund (TLYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIHFX | TLYIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 1.93 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 1.72 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.38 | 7.79 | +0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIHFX | TLYIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.74 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.71 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIHFX and TLYIX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIHFX vs. TLYIX - Dividend Comparison
FIHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than TLYIX's 3.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIHFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class | 2.80% | 2.77% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.14% | 1.93% | 2.15% | 16.14% | 2.21% | 1.81% | 1.95% | 2.03% |
TLYIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund | 3.74% | 3.70% | 3.09% | 2.19% | 2.70% | 2.89% | 2.03% | 2.26% | 2.73% | 0.15% | 2.56% | 0.27% |
Drawdowns
FIHFX vs. TLYIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIHFX drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, which is greater than TLYIX's maximum drawdown of -26.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIHFX and TLYIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIHFX | TLYIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.42% | -26.39% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.38% | -8.20% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.84% | -23.24% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.42% | -26.39% | -2.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.12% | -5.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -3.83% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.81% | +0.05% |
Volatility
FIHFX vs. TLYIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2035 Fund (TLYIX) have volatilities of 4.47% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIHFX | TLYIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 4.33% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.79% | 6.70% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.54% | 11.42% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 11.44% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 12.45% | +0.91% |