PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIHFX vs. FQIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIHFX vs. FQIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIHFX achieves a 8.31% return, which is significantly higher than FQIFX's 6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FIHFX has outperformed FQIFX with an annualized return of 10.31%, while FQIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.94% annualized return.


FIHFX

1D
-0.62%
1M
2.71%
YTD
8.31%
6M
8.77%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
10.31%

FQIFX

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.12%
YTD
6.64%
6M
6.95%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
7.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIHFX vs. FQIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIHFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class
8.31%17.32%11.22%17.25%-17.49%13.73%15.54%24.87%-6.77%20.35%
FQIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class
6.64%14.84%8.49%13.88%-16.54%9.52%13.56%19.63%-4.51%15.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FIHFX and FQIFX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.99

The correlation between FIHFX and FQIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIHFX vs. FQIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIHFX
FIHFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FIHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FIHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FQIFX
FQIFX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FQIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FQIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIHFX vs. FQIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIHFXFQIFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.45

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.90

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.12

12.78

+0.34

FIHFX vs. FQIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIHFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the FQIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIHFX and FQIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIHFXFQIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.36

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.58

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.80

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.72

-0.01

Drawdowns

FIHFX vs. FQIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIHFX drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, which is greater than FQIFX's maximum drawdown of -22.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIHFX and FQIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIHFXFQIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.42%

-22.66%

-5.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-5.98%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.98%

-8.59%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.84%

-22.66%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.42%

-22.66%

-5.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.55%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-3.87%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.35%

+0.25%

Volatility

FIHFX vs. FQIFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) at 2.50%. This indicates that FIHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FQIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIHFXFQIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.50%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

5.97%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

7.33%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.91%

9.55%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.37%

9.90%

+3.47%

FIHFX vs. FQIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FIHFX and FQIFX have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIHFX vs. FQIFX - Dividend Comparison

FIHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than FQIFX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIHFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class
2.57%2.77%2.50%2.10%2.14%1.93%2.15%16.14%2.21%1.81%1.95%2.03%
FQIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class
4.33%4.92%3.36%2.37%2.64%2.10%2.38%13.76%2.31%1.83%1.88%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FIHFX and FQIFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIHFX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to FQIFX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIHFX dropped -28.42% vs FQIFX's -22.66%.

FIHFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIHFX and FQIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer