PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIHFX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIHFX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FIHFX having a 8.31% return and FCNTX slightly higher at 8.62%. Over the past 10 years, FIHFX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 10.31%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.53% annualized return.


FIHFX

1D
-0.62%
1M
2.71%
YTD
8.31%
6M
8.77%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
10.31%

FCNTX

1D
0.80%
1M
4.19%
YTD
8.62%
6M
10.40%
1Y
23.87%
3Y*
27.27%
5Y*
15.06%
10Y*
17.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIHFX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIHFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class
8.31%17.32%11.22%17.25%-17.49%13.73%15.54%24.87%-6.77%20.35%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
8.62%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FIHFX and FCNTX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2009

0.89

The correlation between FIHFX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIHFX vs. FCNTX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIHFX
FCNTX

Technology

25.9%
27.0%

Financial Services

17.1%
13.8%

Industrials

11.7%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.1%
9.2%

Communication Services

8.0%
21.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
3.7%

Energy

4.7%
3.6%

Basic Materials

4.1%
2.1%

Utilities

2.8%
0.5%

Real Estate

2.1%
0.1%

Technology

FIHFX
25.9%
FCNTX
27.0%

Financial Services

FIHFX
17.1%
FCNTX
13.8%

Industrials

FIHFX
11.7%
FCNTX
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FIHFX
9.4%
FCNTX
10.1%

Healthcare

FIHFX
9.1%
FCNTX
9.2%

Communication Services

FIHFX
8.0%
FCNTX
21.2%

Consumer Defensive

FIHFX
5.2%
FCNTX
3.7%

Energy

FIHFX
4.7%
FCNTX
3.6%

Basic Materials

FIHFX
4.1%
FCNTX
2.1%

Utilities

FIHFX
2.8%
FCNTX
0.5%

Real Estate

FIHFX
2.1%
FCNTX
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIHFX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIHFX
FIHFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FIHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FIHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIHFX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIHFXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.32

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.20

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.12

9.33

+3.79

FIHFX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIHFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIHFX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIHFXFCNTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

1.77

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.79

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.89

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.78

-0.06

Drawdowns

FIHFX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIHFX drawdown since its inception was -28.42%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIHFX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIHFXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.42%

-49.19%

+20.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-11.30%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.98%

-19.75%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.84%

-32.59%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.42%

-32.59%

+4.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

0.00%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-8.16%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

2.65%

-1.05%

Volatility

FIHFX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) is 2.92%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that FIHFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIHFXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.30%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.16%

10.47%

-3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

14.02%

-5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.91%

19.15%

-7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.37%

19.68%

-6.31%

FIHFX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIHFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIHFX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FIHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than FCNTX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.30%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%
FIHFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class
2.57%2.77%2.50%2.10%2.14%1.93%2.15%16.14%2.21%1.81%1.95%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIHFX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to FIHFX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIHFX dropped -28.42% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FIHFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIHFX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer