PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIHBX vs. QISCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIHBX vs. QISCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund (QISCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIHBX achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than QISCX's 15.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FIHBX has underperformed QISCX with an annualized return of 5.05%, while QISCX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.


FIHBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.27%
6M
2.24%
1Y
6.62%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
5.05%

QISCX

1D
0.55%
1M
3.49%
YTD
15.16%
6M
16.74%
1Y
41.00%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
9.31%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIHBX vs. QISCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
1.27%8.59%6.40%13.17%-12.64%3.92%5.99%15.01%-2.80%7.19%
QISCX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund
15.16%14.95%14.82%20.58%-23.14%30.60%17.00%18.06%-11.63%15.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FIHBX and QISCX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.34

The correlation between FIHBX and QISCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.52 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIHBX vs. QISCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIHBX
FIHBX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FIHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FIHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

QISCX
QISCX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QISCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QISCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QISCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QISCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QISCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIHBX vs. QISCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund (QISCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIHBXQISCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

1.96

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.46

2.87

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.42

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.06

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.30

9.47

+4.83

FIHBX vs. QISCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIHBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the QISCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIHBX and QISCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIHBXQISCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.96

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.40

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.51

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

0.34

+1.02

Drawdowns

FIHBX vs. QISCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIHBX drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum QISCX drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIHBX and QISCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIHBXQISCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-68.05%

+37.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.45%

-13.48%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

-26.51%

+22.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.35%

-32.89%

+16.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.67%

-49.02%

+27.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-15.67%

+13.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

4.34%

-3.88%

Volatility

FIHBX vs. QISCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) is 1.08%, while Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund (QISCX) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that FIHBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QISCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIHBXQISCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

5.08%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

16.83%

-14.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

21.02%

-17.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.19%

23.24%

-18.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

24.17%

-18.41%

FIHBX vs. QISCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIHBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than QISCX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIHBX vs. QISCX - Dividend Comparison

FIHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, less than QISCX's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
6.44%6.29%5.94%5.93%4.58%4.25%5.14%5.79%6.24%5.55%5.75%6.46%
QISCX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core Fund
6.92%7.97%0.35%0.31%3.77%15.41%0.44%0.36%3.81%4.49%0.85%12.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIHBX and QISCX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QISCX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to FIHBX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIHBX dropped -31.05% vs QISCX's -68.05%.

FIHBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIHBX and QISCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer