PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIHBX vs. KLCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FIHBX vs. KLCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap Fund (KLCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FIHBX vs. KLCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
-1.88%8.59%6.40%13.17%-12.64%3.92%5.99%15.01%-2.80%7.19%
KLCIX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap Fund
-11.73%18.71%90.57%33.02%-30.06%13.95%28.58%38.16%0.16%23.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIHBX achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly higher than KLCIX's -11.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FIHBX has underperformed KLCIX with an annualized return of 5.09%, while KLCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.40% annualized return.


FIHBX

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-0.37%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
5.09%

KLCIX

1D
-0.80%
1M
-9.37%
YTD
-11.73%
6M
-9.65%
1Y
14.91%
3Y*
35.65%
5Y*
16.76%
10Y*
17.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FIHBX vs. KLCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIHBX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KLCIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FIHBX vs. KLCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIHBX
FIHBX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FIHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FIHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

KLCIX
KLCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
KLCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
KLCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIHBX vs. KLCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) and Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap Fund (KLCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIHBXKLCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

0.66

+0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

1.02

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.16

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

0.74

+1.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.25

2.62

+6.64

FIHBX vs. KLCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIHBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the KLCIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIHBX and KLCIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIHBXKLCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

0.66

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.32

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.44

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.41

+0.93

Correlation

The correlation between FIHBX and KLCIX is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FIHBX vs. KLCIX - Dividend Comparison

FIHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, less than KLCIX's 33.54% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
6.03%6.29%5.94%5.93%4.58%4.25%5.14%5.79%6.24%5.55%5.75%6.46%
KLCIX
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap Fund
33.54%29.60%72.67%29.59%26.95%14.50%3.48%4.34%11.36%1.41%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

FIHBX vs. KLCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIHBX drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum KLCIX drawdown of -51.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIHBX and KLCIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FIHBXKLCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-51.80%

+20.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-15.36%

+12.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.35%

-41.04%

+24.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.67%

-41.04%

+19.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-25.06%

+22.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-9.26%

+6.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

4.35%

-3.76%

Volatility

FIHBX vs. KLCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) is 1.36%, while Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap Fund (KLCIX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that FIHBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FIHBXKLCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

5.27%

-3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

11.73%

-9.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

18.44%

-14.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.15%

52.22%

-47.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

39.63%

-33.87%