FIGG vs. CHAU
FIGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FIG Daily ETF) and CHAU (Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FIGG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while CHAU is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index (200%). FIGG is actively managed, while CHAU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. FIGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for CHAU.
Performance
FIGG vs. CHAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGG achieves a -75.22% return, which is significantly lower than CHAU's 0.33% return.
FIGG
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 56.15%
- 6M
- -64.89%
- YTD
- -75.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHAU
- 1D
- -5.35%
- 1M
- -13.41%
- 6M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 35.87%
- 3Y*
- 7.74%
- 5Y*
- -10.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
FIGG vs. CHAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FIGG Leverage Shares 2X Long FIG Daily ETF | -75.22% | -68.14% |
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 0.33% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGG and CHAU is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIGG vs. CHAU — Risk / Return Rank
FIGG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CHAU
FIGG vs. CHAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FIG Daily ETF (FIGG) and Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIGG | CHAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIGG vs. CHAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGG drawdown since its inception was -95.77%, which is greater than CHAU's maximum drawdown of -79.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGG and CHAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGG | CHAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.77% | -79.21% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -59.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -71.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.28% | -59.51% | -32.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.23% | -58.83% | -20.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.07% | — |
Volatility
FIGG vs. CHAU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIGG | CHAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 149.43% | 38.62% | +110.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 149.43% | 47.64% | +101.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 149.43% | 47.41% | +102.02% |
FIGG vs. CHAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAU's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIGG vs. CHAU - Dividend Comparison
FIGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAU Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares | 2.16% | 1.97% | 2.25% | 3.97% | 0.77% | 1.73% | 0.09% | 0.58% | 0.83% |
FIGG Leverage Shares 2X Long FIG Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIGG and CHAU have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FIGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FIGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CHAU.
CHAU has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.00% for FIGG.
FIGG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CHAU is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FIGG and 1.21% for CHAU.
Find the right allocation for FIGG and CHAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer