PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIGG vs. BMNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIGG vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FIG Daily ETF (FIGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIGG having a -74.27% return and BMNG slightly lower at -75.13%.


FIGG

1D
-12.59%
1M
18.39%
YTD
-74.27%
6M
-75.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMNG

1D
-12.21%
1M
-48.30%
YTD
-75.13%
6M
-85.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIGG vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FIGG
Leverage Shares 2X Long FIG Daily ETF
-74.27%-54.18%
BMNG
Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF
-75.13%-81.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FIGG and BMNG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIGG vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FIG Daily ETF (FIGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FIGG vs. BMNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIGGBMNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.66

-0.52

-0.14

Drawdowns

FIGG vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIGG drawdown since its inception was -95.11%, roughly equal to the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGG and BMNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIGGBMNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.11%

-95.36%

+0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.99%

-95.36%

+3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-77.03%

-81.38%

+4.35%

Volatility

FIGG vs. BMNG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIGGBMNGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

148.39%

191.58%

-43.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

148.39%

191.58%

-43.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

148.39%

191.58%

-43.19%

FIGG vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FIGG and BMNG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

FIGG vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither FIGG nor BMNG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FIGG and BMNG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FIGG and BMNG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

FIGG and BMNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIGG and BMNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer