FIGCX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C (FIGCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FIGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2007. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FIGCX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIGCX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGCX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C | -6.06% | 16.70% | 4.24% | 19.59% | -24.00% | 14.19% | 15.75% | 32.65% | -12.46% | 28.23% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIGCX achieves a -6.06% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FIGCX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 7.27%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
FIGCX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -13.51%
- YTD
- -6.06%
- 6M
- -6.06%
- 1Y
- 7.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.27%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIGCX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIGCX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIGCX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FIGCX
FSKAX
FIGCX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C (FIGCX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIGCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 0.83 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.29 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.19 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.04 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.68 | 5.05 | -3.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIGCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.83 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.59 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.72 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.78 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIGCX and FSKAX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIGCX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FIGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIGCX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C | 3.12% | 2.93% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 1.52% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.07% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FIGCX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIGCX drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGCX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIGCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.53% | -35.01% | -21.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | -12.42% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.58% | -25.39% | -10.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.58% | -35.01% | -0.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.03% | -8.92% | -5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -4.05% | -7.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 2.57% | +0.97% |
Volatility
FIGCX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class C (FIGCX) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.42%. This indicates that FIGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIGCX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 4.42% | +3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.67% | 9.40% | +3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.00% | 18.50% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 17.38% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 18.42% | -0.89% |