FIGB vs. PCRB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIGB (Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF) and PCRB (Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FIGB returned 4.09%/yr vs 4.09%/yr for PCRB. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIGB charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PCRB.

Performance

FIGB vs. PCRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIGB achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than PCRB's -0.32% return.

FIGB

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 0.14%
• 6M: 0.08%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: 4.09%
• 5Y*: 0.24%
• 10Y*: —

PCRB

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: -0.32%
• 6M: -0.43%
• 1Y: 4.53%
• 3Y*: 4.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIGB vs. PCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FIGB Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF	0.14%	6.95%	1.51%	3.37%
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -	-0.32%	7.21%	1.91%	2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FIGB and PCRB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023	0.87

The correlation between FIGB and PCRB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIGB vs. PCRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIGB

FIGB Risk / Return Rank: 32
FIGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FIGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FIGB Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FIGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FIGB Martin Ratio Rank: 34

PCRB

PCRB Risk / Return Rank: 33
PCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 31
PCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIGB vs. PCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIGB	PCRB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.21	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	1.84	-0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.21	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	1.51	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.25	4.90	+0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIGB vs. PCRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the PCRB Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIGB and PCRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIGB	PCRB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	1.21	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.59	-0.52

Drawdowns

FIGB vs. PCRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIGB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, which is greater than PCRB's maximum drawdown of -7.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGB and PCRB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIGB	PCRB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.08%	-7.20%	-10.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.93%	-3.02%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.17%	-5.85%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.60%	-2.18%	+0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.92%	-1.64%	-5.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	0.93%	+0.01%

Volatility

FIGB vs. PCRB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) at 1.32%. This indicates that FIGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIGB	PCRB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	1.32%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.87%	2.66%	+0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16%	3.77%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.28%	5.63%	+0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.17%	5.63%	+0.54%

FIGB vs. PCRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIGB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than PCRB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIGB vs. PCRB - Dividend Comparison

FIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than PCRB's 9.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FIGB Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF	4.11%	4.15%	4.28%	3.79%	2.44%	1.10%
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -	9.79%	4.30%	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIGB and PCRB in my portfolio?

FIGB and PCRB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIGB or PCRB?

FIGB has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to PCRB (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIGB dropped -18.08% vs PCRB's -7.20%.

Which ETF is better, FIGB or PCRB?

On 3-year performance, PCRB leads with 4.09% vs 4.09% for FIGB. On fees, PCRB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PCRB has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIGB or PCRB?

Over the 3-year period, PCRB has performed better with a 4.09% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIGB or PCRB?

PCRB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FIGB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIGB or PCRB?

PCRB has the higher dividend yield at 9.79%, compared with 4.11% for FIGB.

What is the main difference between FIGB and PCRB?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FIGB and 0.35% for PCRB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCRB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.