PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIGB vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FIGB vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FIGB vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FIGB
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
0.03%6.95%1.51%6.65%-13.43%1.77%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
-1.78%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%22.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIGB achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's -1.78% return.


FIGB

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*

FDVV

1D
2.35%
1M
-5.66%
YTD
-1.78%
6M
0.65%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FIGB vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIGB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FIGB vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIGB
FIGB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FIGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGB Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIGB vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIGBFDVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

0.97

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

1.41

-0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.29

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.12

5.68

-1.57

FIGB vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIGB Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIGB and FDVV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIGBFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

0.97

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.86

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.74

-0.67

Correlation

The correlation between FIGB and FDVV is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FIGB vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

FIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than FDVV's 3.00% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FIGB
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
4.12%4.15%4.28%3.79%2.44%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
3.00%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%

Drawdowns

FIGB vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIGB drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIGB and FDVV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FIGBFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-40.25%

+22.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.46%

-12.34%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.08%

-20.18%

+2.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-7.04%

+5.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.11%

-3.85%

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

2.81%

-1.68%

Volatility

FIGB vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) is 1.71%, while Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that FIGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FIGBFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

4.48%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

7.68%

-4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.16%

15.34%

-10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.25%

14.74%

-8.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.22%

17.09%

-10.87%